Representation of Expressions of Congratulations via WhatsApp Stickers from the Viewpoint of the Sender and Receiver of the Message
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/palakka.v6i1.7746Keywords:
WhatsApp stickers, digital condolences, nonverbal communication.Abstract
Communication of condolences in the digital era has experienced significant changes with the presence of WhatsApp stickers as a nonverbal medium. This research aims to explore how stickers are used to convey condolences, both from the perspective of the sender and recipient of the message. Using a qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 active WhatsApp users who had used or received stickers in the context of condolences. The research results show that stickers are chosen by senders to convey empathy visually, overcome language barriers, and maintain a polite impression, especially in relationships that are not too close. Symbols such as flowers, candles, or neutral colors are common choices because they are considered universal. However, message recipients had mixed responses. Most appreciated the sender's good intentions, but some felt that the stickers were less personal and did not convey enough depth of emotion in a situation of intense grief. The potential for miscommunication is also found if the context and sticker symbols are inappropriate or difficult to understand. This study highlights the importance of sensitivity in using WhatsApp stickers as a medium for emotional communication as well as the need for digital literacy to support more empathetic and effective visual communication.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Burgoon, J. K., & Hoobler, G. D. (2002). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 240–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Buehler, R. (2021). Medium-message congruence in digital communication: When form enhances function. Journal of Communication Theory, 31(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa020
Chen, X., Huang, Q., & Davison, R. M. (2018). The role of website quality and social capital in building buyers' loyalty. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 25-37.
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statistics in Medicine, 32(4), 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5408
Herring, S. C., & Dainas, A. R. (2020). Gender and age influences on interpretation of emoji functions. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 3(2), 1-26.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
Kaye, L. K., Wall, H. J., & Malone, S. A. (2017). "Turn that frown upside-down": A contextual account of emoticon usage on different virtual platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 463-467.
Kelly, R., & Watts, L. (2015). Characterising the inventive appropriation of emoji as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships. Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design.
Lim, S. S. (2015). On stickers and communicative fluidity in social media. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1-3.
Musrifah, M., Fitriana, A. D., Nurhakki, N., & Sahid, M. (2024). Convergence Strategy of Radio Peduli in Parepare on Maintaining the Audience. Palakka: Media and Islamic Communication, 5(1), 66–76.
Park, J., Baek, Y. M., & Cha, M. (2018). Cross-cultural comparison of nonverbal cues in emoticons on Twitter: Evidence from big data analysis. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 916-936.
Rusnali, A. N. A., Bahfiarti, T., Mau, M., & Faried, M. (2024). Environmental Communication in West Sulawesi: The Role of Media and Technology in Nature Conservation Campaigns. Palakka: Media and Islamic Communication, 5(2), 156–172.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2019). Emoticon, emoji, and sticker use in computer-mediated communication: A review of theories and research findings. International Journal of Communication, 13, 27.
Tang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2020). Emoticons and emojis as non-verbal cues in computer-mediated communication: Understanding their communicative functions and conceptual meanings. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01043
Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443–479). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Zhou, R., Hentschel, J., & Kumar, N. (2017). Goodbye text, hello emoji: Mobile communication on WeChat in China. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 748-759.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with Palakka: Media and Islamic Communication agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
