PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT BASED INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING WRITING FOR SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL IN MAKASSAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/ijretal.v5i2.7380Keywords:
Portfolio Assessment Based Instruction, Writing SkillAbstract
The objectives of this research were to find out whether or not the use of portfolio assessment based instruction improves the students’ writing skill. This research employed Experimental Research design. The sample consisted of 36 students of grade X SMA Negeri 5 Makassar academic year of 2022/2023. The data were collected through the instruments: writing test for the students’ writing skill. Data on the students’ writing skill were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results of the research were: the use of portfolio assessment based instruction in teaching writing improved the students writing skill. The mean score of students in post-test (2.8) was higher than pre-test (1.6) or increased 1.2 points. These conditions show that there was the improvement of students’ achievement in writing toward the application of portfolio assessment in ELT, particularly in the students’ writing class. It can be concluded that the use of portfolio assessment based is effective to be implemented in improving the students’ writing skills.
Â
References
Aditiawan Chandra. Nopember 1999. Kasus Otonomi pada Program Studi, Lembaga dan Proyek. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi & Universitas di Indonesia dalam era Otonomi & Globalisasi, di Universitas Gajah Mada.
Arie Senduperdana. 2007. Analisis hasil belajar mata kuliah umum. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 64, 23-35.
Arikunto, Suharsini. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ascher, C. 1994. Cooperative education as a strategy for school-to-work transition. CenterFocus, 3. Diakses 8 Agustus 2008, National Center for Research in Vocational Education dari: http://ncrve.berkeley.edu/CenterFocus/cf3.html.
Atika Walujani Moedjiono. 18 Desember 2007. Laporan akhir tahun 2007 pembangunan manusia. Ada kemajuan, banyak tantangan. Kompas, p. 6.
Bambang Budiono. Mei 2001. Penyelenggaraan pendidikan diploma di era global. Makalah disajikan dalam Semiloka Nasional Pengembangan Pendidikan Diploma untuk Memenuhi Kebutuhan Tenaga Kerja Industri Era Global dalam rangka Optimasi Potensi Daerah, di Hotel Garuda Yogyakarta.
Bailey, T. & Meritt, D. 2007. Youth apprenticeship : lesson from the U.S. experience. CenterFocus, 1. Diakses 8 Agustus 2008, National Center for Research in Vocational Education dari: http://ncrve.berkeley.edu/ CenterFocus/cf1.html.
Birgin, Osman, & A. Baki. 2007. The use of portfolio to assess students’ performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education.
Boud, D., & Solomon, N. 2001. Work-based learning a new higher education? London: SRHE and Open University Press.
Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D. 1983. Educational research. New York & London: Longman. 323
Bragg, D. D. 1995. Work-based learning in two-year colleges in the united states, National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Berkeley, CA. ERIC No : EDIII78446. Diakses pada tanggal 10 Pebruari 2009.
Braham, J. & Pickering, J. 2007. Widening participation and improving economic competitiveness; the dual role of work-based learning within foundation degrees. Proceedings of The Work-based Learning Futures Conference, UK, Buxton, April 2007, 45-52.
Brett, E. & Skinner, D. 2006. What is work-based learning? Lesson from the uniformed public services. Anglia Ruskin University: LTN business fellow.
Brindly, G. 2001. Assessment. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan Eds. The Cambridge University Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language, 4th ed pp.137- 143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, H. D. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education.
Bukit, Masriam. 2002. Beberapa masalah dalam implementasi pendidikan sistem ganda di SMK. Dalam Dedi Supriadi Ed., Sejarah pendidikan teknik dan kejuruan di Indonesia pp. 527-542. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Byars, L. & Rue, L. W. 2000. Management skill and application. Boston: Irwin McGrawHill.
Cascio, W. F. 1998. Applied psychology in human resouce management Fifth edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Chadd, J. & Anderson, M.A. 2005. Illinois work-based learning programs: Mentoring knowledge and training. Career and Technical Education Research, 30, 25-45.
Clarke, L. & Winch, C. 2008. Vocational education. Internasional approaches, developments and systems. London & New York: Routledge.
Clemmons, J., Laase, L., Cooper, D., Areglado, N., & Dill, L. 2013. Portfolio in the Classroom: A teacher’s sourcebook. New York: Scholastic Inc.
Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. G. 1996. SPSS for Windows: Analysis without anquish. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Columba, L. & Dolgos, K.A. 2015. Portfolio assessment in Mathematics. Reading Improvement, 32 3: 174-176.
Connexions direct – Information & advice for young people. Diakses pada tanggal 2 Pebruari 2009, dari: http://www.connexions-direct.com/index.cfm
Connor, H. & MacFarlane, K. 2006. Work related learning in HE: a scoping study. Glasgow Caledonian University: Research in Lifelong Learning.
Coombe, C. & Barlow, L. 2004. The reflective portfolio: Two case studies from the United Arab Emirates. English Teaching Forum, 42I, 18- 23.
Cox, J. 2006. The quality of an instructional programme. National Education Association-Alaska. Diakses 9 Juli 2008 dari http://www.ak.nea.org/ excellence/coxquality. 324
Cristensen, L. B. 1988. Experimental Methodology. New York, Massachusets: Allyn & Bacon.
Cruickshank, D. R. 1990. Research that informs teachers and teacher educators. Bloomington: PhiDeltaKappa Educational Foundation.
Cunningham, I., Dawes, G., & Bennet, B. 2004. The handbook of work based learning. Burlington: Gower Publishing Company.
D. Nunan Eds. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, 4th ed. pp.28-33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Getsempena English Education Journal GEEJ Vol.4 No.2 Novemver 2017 163 Yogyakarta: English Education Study Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts. State University of Yogyakarta.
Data Statistik Indonesia 2009. Diakses 20 Juni 2009 dari http://www.datastatistik-indonesia.com/component/option,com_tabel/task,/Itemid,171/
Davenport, T.H., Leibold, M., & Voepel. 2006. Strategic management in the innovation economy. Erlangen: Publicis Kommunikations Agentur Gmbh, GWA.
Deal, T. E. & Petterson, K. D. 1999. Shaping school culture: the heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Dedi Supriadi. 1999. Mengangkat citra dan martabat guru. Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusa.
Dedi Supriadi. 2002. Satu setengah abad pendidikan kejuruan di Indonesia. Dalam Dedi Supriadi Ed., Sejarah pendidikan teknik dan kejuruan di Indonesia pp. 1-32. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
De Jong, J.A.S., Wierstra, R.F.A., & Hermanussen, J. 2006. An exploration of the relationship between academic and experiential learning approarches in vocational education. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2006, 76, 155-169.
Depdiknas. 1996. Visi dan strategi pembangunan pendidikan untuk tahun 2020 tuntutan terhadap kualitas. Ceramah menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan pada Konvensi Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia III. Ujungpandang, 4-7 Maret 1996. Jakarta : Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi.
Depdiknas. 2001. Reposisi pendidikan vokasi menjelang 2020. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Kejuruan.
Depdiknas 2008. Evaluasi program dan capaian kinerja pembangunan pendidikan tahun 2005-2006 dan beban target 2008 dan 2009. Disajikan Dalam Rembuk Nasional Pendidikan 2008, 4 - 6 Februari 2008 di Jakarta. 325
Direktorat Dikmenjur. 2002. Pokok-pokok pikiran pengembangan pendidikan kejuruan menjelang 2020. Dalam Dedi Supriadi Ed., Sejarah pendidikan teknik dan kejuruan di Indonesia pp. 585-602. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Djojonegoro, Wardiman. 1998. Pengembangan sumberdaya manusia melalui sekolah menengah kejuruan SMK. Jakarta : PT Jayakarta Agung Offset.
Douglas, D. 2000. Assessment Language for Specific Purposes. In J.C. Alderson, & L.F. Bachman Eds. The Cambridge Language Gatemen English Education Journal GEEJ Vol.4 No.2 November 2017 | 162 Assessment Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with International Journal of Research on English Teaching and Applied Linguistics agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
