ONE-ON-ONE LEARNING METHOD IN SOLVING ENGLISH SPEAKING PROBLEMS: A STUDY ON EFL LEARNERS

Juspaningsih Juspaningsih* -  Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Balikpapan, Indonesia

DOI : 10.30863/ijretal.v4i1.5009

The goal of the current study was to provide more information on one-on-one instruction as a learning approach for EFL learners' English speaking difficulties. The study's main interests were the EFL students' perceptions of one-on-one instruction and the speaking skills they acquired from it. This study employed a qualitative research design. Semi-structured interviews, documentation and speaking activity observation were used as data gathering methods. The researcher included EFL students who take speaking-focused courses at an English course in Makassar in the data collection process. There were ten EFL students available for an interview. After gathering the data, the researcher examined the data using three steps of data analysis; data reduction, data display and conclusion drawing/verification. The findings of this study showed that EFL students had difference opinions about one-on-one instruction. One-on-one instruction, according to them, is good, great, effective, efficient, fun, adaptable, and peaceful. Then, there were certain speaking exercises that EFL learners typically pick up along the learning process to hone their speaking skills. These speaking exercises included role plays, retelling movies, describing images, speaking games like dominos and speaking boards, question and answer sessions, telling daily activities, sharing experiences, outlining preferences, and talking about planning.

Keywords
One-on-one learning; Speaking; EFL learners
  1. Gillham Bill. (2005). Research Interviewing: The Range of Technique. New York: University Press.
  2. John W. Creswell. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  3. Karlfried Knapp and Barbara Seidlhofer. (2009). Handbook of Foreign Language Communication and Learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  4. Koosha, Bahare,. Keetabi, Saeed., & Kassaean, S. (2011). The Effects of Self-esteem, Age and Gender on the Speaking Skills of Intermediate University EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (10), 1328–1337.
  5. Luliana Lungu. (2013). Designing An English for Adults Non-Philological Students in Long-Life Learning Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 76, 456–459.
  6. Marylin Lewis and Tasha Bleisten. (2015). One-on-One Language Teaching and Learning: Theory and Practice. New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.
  7. Matthew B. Miles dan A Michael Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (second Edi). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  8. N. Ramila Diaz. (2015). English Private Tutoring in France: The Race for A Better Job Starts in Advertisement Campaigns. Rocedia - Social and Behavioral Science, 176, 176–180.
  9. Renandya, R. and. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Ruijuan Wu, R. W. dan V. T. Le. (n.d.). Challenges of Adult in Learning English as A Second Language: Focus on Adult Education in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5 (5), 1132–1138.
  11. Samira Al Hosni. (2014). Speking Difficulties Encountered by Young Learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSEEL), 2(6), 22–30.
  12. Szeto, E. (2014). A Comparison of Online/Face-to-Face Students’ and Instructors’ Experiences: Examining Blended Synchronous Learning Effects. Procedia, Sosial and Behavioral Science, 116, 4250-4254.
  13. Thornbury. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. England: Longman.
  14. Ur, P. (1996). A course in Language Teaching. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Watskin, S. (2010). Ten Good Reasons to Choose One-to-One Language Training. Retrieved 20 April 1BC, from http://www.cactusworldwide.com/blog/2010/07/26/10-good-reasons-to-choose-one-to-one-language-training/.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2023-07-06
Published: 2023-07-06
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 123 89