Insani Nurchintyawati* -  Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam DDI Pinrang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Nurul Ilmi -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone, Indonesia, Indonesia
Pujalinda Mandarsari -  Akademi Keperawatan YPPP Wonomulyo, Indonesia, Indonesia
Syauqiyah Awaliyah Alfiani Nur -  Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Yapika Makassar, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI : 10.30863/ijretal.v4i1.5007

Virtual education has exploded in recent years and become even more central to university and school life globally, especially with the advent of Covid-19. With the rise in popularity of virtual meetings, an increasing number of teachers use them to teach English speaking as an alternative to face-to-face instruction. This article examines the attitudes of teachers and the features of virtual meeting platforms that help and hinder the teaching of speaking skills. The study was conducted at several universities in South Sulawesi, Indonesia, based on a survey of twelve teachers. Seven teachers have recognized virtual meetings for their positive attitudes toward their use in teaching English speaking. Virtual meeting applications raise the most critical concerns regarding limited expression and limited variation. The most popular platforms among teachers are Zoom and Google Meet.

speaking skill; virtual meeting; teacher perception & experience; higher education
  1. Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: a literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115
  2. Arfani, S., & Sulistia, A. (2019). Teaching speaking using a “snake and ladder” board game: a teacher story. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 2(1), 65–74. http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/RILL
  3. Arumsari, A., & Octaviani, S. K. (2021). The effectiveness of virtual learning on English speaking skill for stundents of infromation system program. Surakarta English and Literature Journal, 4(1), 32–43.
  4. Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2008). The practice of social research (South African ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.
  5. Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20. doi:10.1017/S0958344014000159
  6. Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fourth Edi). Sage Publications.
  7. Edge, J. (1999). Essentials of English Language Teaching. New York: Longman Publishing.
  8. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284
  9. Fakhruddin, A. (2018). Using google meet in teaching speaking. Journal of English Language Learning (JELL), 2(2), 43–46.
  10. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  11. Healey, D. (2018). Technology Enhanced Learning Environments. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0437
  12. Hung, S. A. (2015). Video blogging and English presentation performance: A pilot study. Psychological Reports: Sociocultural Issues in Psychology, 117(2), 614-630.
  13. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
  14. K. E. Adenegan, & O. A. Abiodun. (2018). Usage of Zoom Cloud Meeting for Virtual Meetings and E-Learning. Green Institute, 1–13.
  15. Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
  16. Kessler, M., Loewen, S., & Trego, D. (2021). Synchronous video computer-mediated communication in English language teaching. ELT Journal, 75(3), 371–376. https://doi.org/10. 1093/elt/ccab007
  17. Kim, C. M., Kim, K. M, Lee, C., Spector, M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teacher Training and Education, 29, 76-85.
  18. Kultawanich, K., Koraneekij, P., & Na-Songkhla, J. (2015). A proposed model of connectivism learning using cloud-based virtual classroom to enhance information literacy and information literacy self-efficacy for undergraduate students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.394
  19. Mirzajani, H., Rosnaini, M., Ayub, A. F. M., & Wong, S. L. (2016). Teachers’ Acceptance of ICT and Its Integration in the Classroom. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 26- 40.
  20. Mustikawati, A. (2013). The effectiveness of using video in teaching speaking for the eighth grade students of SMPN 1 Manisrenggo (Unpublished thesis). Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta.
  21. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.
  22. Nguyen, C. B. T. (2021). Exploring Challenges of Major English Students Towards Learning English Speaking Skills Online During Covid 19 Pandemic and Some Suggested Solutions. In Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference (Vol. 621, pp. 135-144).
  23. Nugroho, A., Haghegh, M., & Triana, Y. (2021). Emergency remote Teaching amidst Global Pandemic: Voices of Indonesian EFL Teachers. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i1.3258
  24. Octavia, V. S. (2015). The effectiveness of teaching speaking using video narrative to the eight grade students at SMPN 5 Tulungagung in academic year 2014/2015 (Unpublished thesis). Nusantara PGRI University, Kediri.
  25. Oeppen, R. S., Shaw, G., & Brennan, P. A. (2020). Human factors recognition at virtual meetings and video conferencing: how to get the best performance from yourself and others. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 58(6), 643–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.04.046
  26. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
  27. Pratama, H., Azman, M. N. A., Kassymova, G. K., & Duisenbayeva, S. S. (2020). The trend in using online meeting applications for learning during the period of pandemic COVID-19: a Literature review. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i2.15
  28. Putri, N. A., & Suryaman, M. (2022). English major students’ attitudes towards the use of zoom meeting for online learning in learning English speaking skill. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(2), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i2.468
  29. Rawashdeh, A. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: analyzing students’ perspectives. 19(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168
  30. Sadiman, A., Rahardjo, R., Haryono dan Harjito. (2009). Media pendidikan: Pengertian, pengembangan, dan pemanfaatannya. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  31. Saeed Al-Sobhi, B. M., & Preece, A. S. (2018). Teaching English speaking skills to the Arab students in the Saudi school in Kuala Lumpur: problems and solutions. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.1p.1
  32. Saleng, M., Manurung, K., & Darmawan. (2014). The Implementation of video learning to improve speaking ability. E-Journal of English Language Teaching Society (ELTS), 2(3), 1-14.
  33. Sudjana, N., & Rivai, A. (1997). Media pengajaran. Sinar Baru Algesindo.
  34. Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15(2016), 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
  35. Vurdien, R. (2019). Videoconferencing: Developing students’ communicative competence. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 4(2), 269–298. https://doi.org/https: //www.learntechlib.org/p/208828/article_208828.pdf
  36. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Fifth). SAGE Publications.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2023-07-06
Published: 2023-07-06
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 146 117