ERROR ANALYSIS OF WRITTEN PEER FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ WRITING TASK AT PONDOK PESANTREN DARUL HADIST AIR RIAU KINALI

Authors

  • Fauziah Putri State Islamic College of Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Hilma Pami Putri State Islamic College of Bukittinggi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/ijretal.v3i2.3902

Keywords:

Error Analysis, Writing, Peer Feedback.

Abstract

The background of the research was the problems faced by students in providing feedback on students’ writing in the 11th grade of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Pondok Pesantren Darul Hadist Air Rau Kinali. There were some problems that the researcher found. First one, some students did some error in correcting their peers because their English is limited. The last one, the students didn’t learn from the error because the teacher didn’t discuss the error with the students. The purpose of this research was to find out what types of errors were made in a written peer feedback that was used by the eleventh grades students of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) Pondok Pesantren Darul Hadist Air Rau Kinali. In this research, the researcher used a qualitative descriptive research. The researcher took total sampling to take the data. There were 18 students in Madrasah Aliyah (MA) that applied peer feedback in writing. The data was obtained through the students’ writing tasks, namely writing descriptive text. Analyzed the writing task based on the theory from Ellis. From the results of the research, the type of errors that mostly the peers made was misformation. This is because many students make errors in tobe and personal pronouns. After misformation the error made by the peers was omission, then come to misordering, and the last error of addition.

References

Arikunto, S. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ary, D. (2010). Iintroduction to Reaserch in Educational Eight Edition. Canada: Nelson Education, ltd.

Atay, D and Kurt, G. (2007). The Effects of Peer Feedback on the Writing Anxiety of Prospective Turkish Teacher of EFL. Jurnal of Theory and Practice in Education. Vol3 (1): 12-23

Brown, H. D. (2007). Language Assesment: Principles and Classroom Practice. San Francisco: Person Longman.

Brown, D. H. (2007). Prinsiples of Language Learning and Teaching . San Francisco State University: Pearson Education Inc Fifth Edition.

Carl, J. (1998). Error in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Longman.

Chaney cited Ferris Dana. (2001). Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes How Explicit Does it Need to be?. California State University: USA.

Corder, P. S. (1981). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. New York: Oxford University Press.

Crystal, D. (1992). An Encyclipedia Dictionary of Languages . Oxford: Blackwell. P. 125

Dulay., et, al. as cited in Holandyah Muhammad. (2018). An Error Analysis on the Use of Personal Pronouns in Descriptive Writing Made by the Eight Grade Students of SMP Nurul Iman. Palembang; South Sumatera.

Dulay, et. al. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.

David, Nunan. (2003). Practice English Language Teaching. New York: The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies.

Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition . Oxford University Press. New York.

Ellis, R. (2003). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford.

Ellis, R. (2000). The Study of Second Language Acquisition . Hongkong: Oxford University Press.

Falchicov, N. (2001). Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in High Education. New York: Routledge Falmer.

Ferris. (2012). Peer Feedback in Writing. New York : Educational Jurnal.

Francis, V. (2011). Error Correction in Second Language Writing. Queensland University: Review of Educational Research.

Garofalo. Russell. & Maulligan. (2011). Collaborative writing Approach Methodology and Student Assesment. The Language Teacher.

Gay, L. a. (2000). Educational Research Competence for Analysis and Aplication. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Company.

Hemchua, S. & Schmitt, N. (2006). An Analysis of Lexical errors in the English compositions of Thai Learners, Bangkok. Thailand: Srinakharinwirot University.

Hill, C. (2011). The Interaction of instruction, Teacher Comment, and Revision in Teaching the Composing process. Research in the Teaching of English.

Hyland, K. (2006). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Iskandar. (2009). Methodology Penelitian dan Pendidikan Sosial. Jakarta: Caung Persada Press.

James, C. (1998). Error in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Longman.

Jeremy, H. (1999). How to Teach Grammar. England.

Lufri. (2005). Penelitian Kualitatif. Surabaya: English Jurnal.

Lyster, R. . (2010). Oral Feedback in Classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. V32 p265-302 2010.

Medonca, C. O. (2007). Peer-Review Negonations’ Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction. TESOL Quarter.

Nelson, G. cited Holandyah, Muhammad. et. al. (2018). An Error Annalysis on the Use of Personal Pronouns in Descriptive Writing Made by the Eight Grade Students of SMP Nurul Iman Palembang, South Sumatera. Jambi- English Language Teaching Journal. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/jelt/index. 98.

Nunan. (2003). Pratical English Language Teaching. New York: The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Nunan. (2004). Pratical English Language Teaching. New York: The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Nuraeni. (2014). The effectiveness of Peer Feedback Technique Through Cooperative Learning to Improve Students’ Ability in Writing Narrative Texts. Indonesia University, Unpublished Thesis.

Ohiou. (2014). Feedback. The Power of Feedback. New York: Review of Educational Research.

Oshima, A. and Hogue. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing. Third edition. New York: Pearson Education.

Peacock, G. G. (2010). Practical Handbook of School Psychology: Effective Practice for 21 Century. New York: Guildford Press.

Roberts Barrie. (2001). Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes How Explicit Does it Need to be?. California State University: USA.

Rod, E. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sari Puspita, & Putri Dwi Yusnita. Menemukan Kesalahan Gramatika dalam Esai Mahasiswa dan Solusi Menghindarinya. Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan. Vol.2 no.2 Oktober 2016.

Schmitt, S. H. (2006). An Analysis of Lexical Errors in the English Compositions of Thai Learners, Bangkok. Thailand: Srinakharinwirot University.

Siregar. 2012. Improve Students’ Writing skill Toward Peer Feedback Technique. Unpublished Thesis.

Slamet., St. Y. 2008. Dasar-dasar Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Sokholik. (2005). Teaching Writing. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill. P. 98

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Walsh, K. (2010). The importance of writing skills: Online tools to encourage success. Retrieved December 27, 2012, from http://www.emergingedtech.com/2010/11/the-importance-of-writing-skills-on line-tools-to-encourage-success/.

WANG ZQ, GR, & PAN cited Chun-xian ZHENG. (2007). A Study of Error Peer Feedback. China.

Zamel. Tesol Quarterly. http://www.Jstor.org, Retrieved on August 16 th 2021 on Monday 10 p.m. 2007.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-19

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with International Journal of Research on English Teaching and Applied Linguistics agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.