TRANSITIVITY IN ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT SELECTED BY PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS: A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS (SFL) ANALYSIS
Keywords:
transitivity, analytical exposition text, pre-service teachersAbstract
This study investigates the transitivity in analytical exposition texts selected by pre-service teachers through the application of Halliday's Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) theory. This study aims to identify the dominant types of processes and explore how processes construct meaning and argumentation in analytical exposition texts. A descriptive qualitative approach and textual analysis were applied in this study. The data analyzed were four analytical exposition texts selected by pre-service teachers from the 2021 cohort. The analysis was conducted manually and utilized UAM CorpusTool to ensure accuracy. The findings indicate that material processes are the dominant process across all texts, followed by relational processes, mental processes, verbal processes, and existential processes, while behavioral processes were absent. Material processes present observable actions and cause–effect reasoning, while relational processes define and classify concepts. Mental processes reveal cognition and emotion, verbal processes cite external authority, and existential processes affirm the presence of issues. Therefore, these process types construct logical, persuasive, and credible arguments. This study has pedagogical implications that pre-service teachers need to comprehend transitivity to design teaching materials that encourage strong argumentation. An understanding of process types helps them to evaluate their writing and supports students' argumentative writing skills.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Darong, H. (2021). From clause to function: Texts analysis using systemic functional linguistics theory and its pedagogical implication in language teaching. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(1), 29–46. doi:10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.337
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
Emilia, E. (2014a). Teaching writing: Developing critical learners. Bandung: Rizqi Press.
Emilia, E. (2014b). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.
Emilia, E., & Martin, J. R. (2023). “Learning functional grammar is fun”: A snapshot of functional grammar unit at an English Education Department in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 48–62. doi:10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58256
Fadiarachmanda, E. (2024). Exploring types of transitivity processes in eighth grade students’ recount text. RETAIN: Journal of Research in English Language Teaching, 12(3), 9–13. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/63351
Fauzi, S., Thohir, L., Zamzam, A., & Melani, B. Z. (2024). An analysis of transitivity system written by English department students. Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF), 4(1), 38–43. doi:10.29303/jeef.v4i1.582
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar: An introductory workbook. New South Wales, Australia: Gerd Stabler.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Hermayanti, W. D., & Gunawan, W. (2024). Understanding analytical exposition text writing with an SFL approach. JEPAL (Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics), 4(2), 124–136. doi:10.32627/jepal.v4i2.894
Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kartini, Y., & Farikah. (2015). Analysis of theme of the analysis exposition text written by the third semester students of English department of Tidar University. International Journal of English and Education, 4(3), 2278–4012.
Martin, J. R. (2009). Functional grammar and the language of schooling. In P. H. H. T. (Ed.), Enabling pedagogies in the classroom: A multi-dimensional view (pp. 22–35). Dordrecht: Springer.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007a). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007b). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
Mulyanti, W. (2015). Transitivity system in exposition texts for senior high school national examinations (Master’s thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/20025
Mulyanti, W., & Wati, S. (2022). Transitivity system in narrative texts. JPE (Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama), 9(1), 133–146. doi:10.30734/jpe.v9i1.2252
Nugraha, E. N. (2024). A comparative analysis of narrative text using the transitivity system and its pedagogical implications. TELL-US Journal, 9(4). doi:10.22202/tus.2023.v9i4.7511
Nurwanti, N. (2022). A transitivity analysis on the third semester English Education Department students' descriptive writing. SIBATIK Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan, 1(2), 41–50. doi:10.54443/sibatik.v1i2.11
O’Donnell, M. (2008). The UAM CorpusTool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso de AESLA (Vol. 3, p. 5). Almeria, Spain.
Senjawati, D. (2016). Transitivity analysis of tenth grade students’ recount texts. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 1–22. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/4617
Septianti, Y. N., & Kurniawan, E. (2022). An analysis of transitivity in analytical exposition texts written by eleventh grade students. LETS: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching Studies, 59–73. doi:10.46870/lets.v5i1.688
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Turner, D. P. (2020). Sampling methods in research design. Headache, 60, 8–12. doi:10.1111/head.13707
Wibowo, E. P., Lestari, A., & Adrian, M. (2024). A comparative analysis of transitivity system in model and student descriptive texts. Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humaniora, 9(2), 104. doi:10.36722/sh.v9i2.2831
Yolanda, F., & Zaim, M. (2021). Transitivity analysis of hortatory exposition written by third year students of English Education Program at Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 1–12. doi:10.24036/jelt.v10i1.111518
Zein, T. T., Sinar, T. S., Nurlela, N., & Yusuf, M. (2019). Process types of transitivity system in English department students’ narrative texts. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT 2018). doi:10.2991/icoelt-18.2019.21
Zhang, J. (2017). Discourse construction in Chinese EFL learners' argumentative writing. Linguistics and Education, 42, 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2017.08.001
Zhao, S., & Zhang, D. (2017). The effect of SFL-informed genre instruction on writing ability in EFL students. System, 68, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.06.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Salma Fadilah Salma, Wida Mulyanti, Pipit Prihartanti Suharto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with International Journal of Research on English Teaching and Applied Linguistics agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
