Optimizing Educational Facilities and Infrastructure in the Context of Marketing Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/didaktika.v17i1.8933Keywords:
Educational Marketing, Facilities and Infrastructure OptimizationAbstract
This study explores the strategic role of facilities and infrastructure optimization in enhancing educational marketing management at SMAN 30 Bone, Indonesia. The research addresses a critical gap in the alignment between physical resources and institutional promotional efforts in secondary education. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis involving school leaders, teachers, and students. Findings reveal that while the school has implemented relatively effective marketing strategies, the lack of adequate learning facilities and basic infrastructure such as laboratory tools, sports equipment, and religious spaces poses challenges to achieving educational excellence and stakeholder satisfaction. The optimization of both facilities and infrastructure was found to directly influence parents’ and students’ perceptions of educational quality, which in turn affected enrollment decisions. This study contributes to the discourse on education service marketing by highlighting the interdependence between infrastructure development and institutional image-building. The implications underscore the need for integrated planning in resource allocation, particularly for newly established schools seeking to strengthen their competitive positioning. The findings are relevant for policymakers, school administrators, and education planners aiming to enhance school attractiveness and community trust through strategic infrastructure investment.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bush, T., & Middlewood, D. (2013). Leading and Managing People in Education (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Chung, E., & Ng, I. C. L. (2010). The dynamic role of social capital in the creation of service value. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011072577
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Earthman, G. I. (2002). School facility conditions and student academic achievement. UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access (IDEA). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5sw56439
Filardo, M. (2016). State of Our Schools: America’s K–12 Facilities. 21st Century School Fund. Retrieved from https://www.21csf.org
Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (1995). Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2019). Indonesia National Education Standards Guidelines (Pedoman Standar Nasional Pendidikan). Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlikeInternational License.