Interruption in Interaction of Research Presentation

Penulis

  • Ferawaty Syam Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif PSDKU Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/palakka.v2i2.2275

Abstrak

The present study highlights the communication which is concerned spoken discourse that occurs in an interaction in research presentations. The goals of this study are to explore how the interruptions in interaction are used in EFL (English a Foreign Language) students’ research presentation and what sorts and intentions on it. Thus, this study scrutinizes EFL students who presented research proposals and lecturers who supervised and examined them at the postgraduate program of State University of Makassar in 2017. The number of participants in this study was 20 academicians who were taken as a sample purposively. This study was navigated by descriptive qualitative method. To collect data, the writer employed discourse analysis approach by using video recorder to probe the spoken of speaker in doing conversation. Data recording was transformed into transcript. The transcription was coded to obtain the excerpt to be interpreted to find out the sorts of interruption in interaction of research presentation. Findings exposed that interruption are delivered in a competitive and cooperative manner. The two forms of interruption, there are two sorts with several intentions, including alert that aims to remind, inform, and correct the previous speaker. In addition, there is also a met comment that aims to questioning, suggesting, and jesting.

Referensi

French, P & Local, J. (1986). Prosodic Features and the Management of Interruptions. 157-180. In C. Johns-Lewis, ed., Intonation in Discourse. San Diego: College-Hill Press. 157-180

Hyland & Paltridge. (2011). The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group

Kalir, JH & Dean, J. (2018). Web Annotation as Conversation and Interruption. The Journal of Media Practice

Köktürk, S. (2012). Forms & Multifunctionality of Innterruptions and Simultaneous Speaking in Ordinary Talk Proposal of a Universal Model for the Evaluation of Interruptive Speech Sequences. International Journal of Linguistics 2012, Vol. 4. No. 3. http://www.macrothink.org/ijl_551

Lustig, M.W. & J. Koester. (2010). Intercultural Competence: Interpersonal Communication Across Cultures. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Lycan, William G. (2011). Conversation, Politeness, and Interruption. Paper in Linguistics

Mahmud, M. (2017). Doing Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Yogyakarta: Phoenix

Mutiara, N. (2006). The Turn-taking Strategies and the Dominant Speaker between the Main Characters based on Gender Theory in "Pretty Woman". (Graduate), Petra Christian University, Surabaya

Stenstrom, A.B. (1994). An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London and New York: Longman

Wood, L.A. & Kroger, R.O. (2000). Doing Discourse Analysis. New Delhi: SAGE Publication

Yang, L.C. (2005). Visualising Spoken Discourse: Prosodic Form and Discourse Function of Interruptions. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W01/W01-1628.pdf

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2021-12-31

Cara Mengutip

Syam, F. (2021). Interruption in Interaction of Research Presentation. Palakka : Media and Islamic Communication, 2(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.30863/palakka.v2i2.2275

Terbitan

Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Media and Islamic Communication

Bagian

Articles

Citation Check

Lisensi

Authors who publish with Palakka: Media and Islamic Communication agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.