METODELOGI MAQASHID AL-SYARI’AH JASSER AUDA SEBAGAI PENDEKATAN BARU SISTEM HUKUM ISLAM
DOI : 10.35673/as-hki.v4i1.2427
Abstract
Maqasid al-Sharia is one of the discourses in the study of fiqh thought, both traditional and contemporary. However, in its development experienced various challenges and problems that surround it. Some of the problems that arise are that ushul fiqh is considered too textual and ignores the purpose of the text. Thus, it makes the purpose of making sharia laws or decisions not in accordance with the context. In this case, Jasser Auda tries to make an effort to criticize this issue. On the other hand, there are some weaknesses in the maqasid theory which does not provide details on certain chapters or problems. So that these conditions are considered unable to provide detailed answers to certain problems. Therefore, in this study, attempts to re-construct and make improvements with various approaches and methodologies initiated by Jasser Auda. Qualitative research methods are used in this study to examine various literatures related to the data that support this research, especially related to the renewal methodology carried out by Jasser Auda in analyzing maqasid al-shariah. This study found that in fact the perspective of the old maqasid concept to the new maqasid, that is, if you look at the classical paradigm, it lies in efforts to protect and guard or preserve. Meanwhile, if you look at the contemporary paradigm, it focuses more on the development and right side.
Keywords: Islamic Law; Jasser Auda; Methodology; Maqasid al-Shariah.
- Al-Jizany, Muhammad Hasan. Ma’alim Ushul al-Fiqh. Libanon: Daar Al-Fikr, 2004.
- Al-Qardhawi, Yusuf Syaikh. Fiqh Maqashid Syariah, 2017.
- Auda, Jasser. Maqasid al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law A Systems Approach. The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2007.
- Betawi, Usman. “Maqashid Al-Syariah Sebagai Dasar Hukum Islam Dalam Pandangan Al-Syatibi Dan Jasser Audha.” Jurnal Hukum Responsif 6, no. 6 (2019): 32–43. http://jurnal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/hukumresponsif/article/view/419.
- Gumanti, Retna. “Maqasid Al-Syariah Menurut Jasser Auda (Pendekatan Sistem dalam Hukum Islam).” Jurnal Al-Himayah 2, no. 1 (2018): 97–118. https://www.journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah/article/view/575/477.
- Hakim, Muhammad Lutfi. “Pergeseran Paradigma Maqasid Al-Syari’ah: Dari Klasik Sampai Kontemporer.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 10, no. 1 (2017): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v10i1.913.
- Hamid, Asrul, dan Dedisyah Putra. “The Existence of New Direction in Islamic Law Reform Based on The Construction of Ibnu Qayyim al-Jauziyah’s Thought.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 20, no. 2 (2021): 247. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i2.3290.
- ———. “The Practice of Buying and Selling During Friday Prayer in Mandailing District Natal: A Study With A Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Approach.” Samarah 5, no. 2 (2021): 1021–43. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.7575.
- Haqan, Arina. “Rekonstruksi Maqasid Al-Syari’ah Jasser Auda.” Jpik 1, no. 1 (2018): 135–52.
- Khalaf, Abdul Wahab. Ilmu Ushul Fiqh: Kaidah Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka Amani, 2003.
- Kholil, Muhammad. “ANALISIS SYISTEM METODOLOGI DAN FILSAFAT HUKUM ISLAM (Analisis Terhadap Pemikiran Jasser Auda).” Al-Ulum : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pemikiran Ke Islaman 5, no. 1 (2018): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.31102/alulum.5.1.2018.34-42.
- Mashuri, Ilham. “Pendekatan Sistem Dalam Teori Hukum Islam (Perspektif Jasser Auda).” FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman 5, no. 1 (2020): 11–28. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v5i1.1106.
- Mukhlishi. “Konsep maqashid al-shariah sebagai teori pembentukan hukum islam tak pernah tuntas perspektif jasser auda.” Maghza 2, no. 1 (2018): 1–13. http://www.jbete.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/JBETE2_115.pdf.
- Prihantoro, Syukur. “Maqasid al-Syari’ah dalam Pandangan Jasser Auda.” Jurnal at-Tafkir X, no. 1 (2017): 120–34.
- Sidiq, Syahrul. “Maqashid Syariah & Tantangan Modernitas: Sebuah Telaah Pemikiran Jasser Auda.” in Right 7, no. 1 (2017): 140–61.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.