REKONSTRUKSI KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN AKTA OTENTIK TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 65/Pdt.G/PTA.Bjm

Authors

  • Karnia Arbella UIN Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Ihda Raudatul Jannah UIN Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v8i1.11670

Keywords:

Proof; Formal Truth; Authentic Deed; Inheritance Case; Electronic Evidence.

Abstract

Proof in civil procedural law should be based on formal truth with documentary evidence (authentic deed) as the main proof. In Decision Number 65/PDT.G/2025/PTA.Bjm, there is an error where the judge prioritized substantive truth over authentic deeds based on electronic evidence, which serves as preliminary evidence. This research aims to analyze the judge's considerations in assessing the hierarchy of evidence and the legal implications of applying the standard of material truth in the inheritance case. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case approach. Primary data were obtained from copies of appellate court decisions, while secondary data were obtained from legal literature and regulations. Analysis shows that the Panel of Judges made an error in applying the conviction raisonnee standard (judicial conviction). The use of WhatsApp conversations as buitengerechtelijke bekentis (extrajudicial confession) to weaken the birth certificate is procedurally incorrect because such evidence does not possess perfect evidentiary strength. Enforcement of substantive truth in civil cases without opposing evidence equivalent to an authentic deed can create legal uncertainty and weaken the position of the authentic deed as a perfect legal instrument.

References

Arisanthi, Ni Made Sinthya Kusuma, I. Nyoman Putu Budiartha, dan I. Nyoman Gede Sugiartha. “Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penilaian Alat Bukti Surat pada Perkara Penetapan Ahli Waris.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 99–103.

Febriansyah, Muhammad Fadhel, Try Mustaqim, Yudi Anugrah Pratama, dan Ria Anggraeni Utami. “Peran Hakim Dalam Menilai Bukti Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 2, no. 1 (2025): 169–74.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum acara perdata: tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan. Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Kobis, Fernando. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 5 (2017): 151201.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. “Penelitian Hukum, cetakan ke-11.” Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

Momuat, Octavianus M. “Alat Bukti Tulisan Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan.” Lex Privatum 2, No. 1 (2014): 147247.

Nadia, Towenty Febri Yanti Br Manihuruk, Rizki Tarananda Galuh, Oktafina Melissa, Dan Tendiyanto Teten. “Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Pertimbangan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Waris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 28/Pdt. G/2022/Pn Wates)”.” Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan Учредители: Asosiasi Seni Desain dan Komunikasi Visual Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2024): 239–47.

Pandiangan, Hendri Jayadi. “Perbedaan hukum pembuktian dalam perspektif hukum acara pidana dan perdata.” to-ra 3, no. 2 (2017): 565–82.

Habawati dan Mustafa, “Penyelesaian Kewarisan To Manang Dalam Masyarakat Kecamatan Cenrana Kabupaten Bone | M.H | Al-Syakhshiyyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan.” Diakses 25 Desember 2024. https://jurnal.iain-bone.ac.id/index.php/alsyakhshiyyah/article/view/2610/pdf.

Ramadhan, Irpan. “Analisis Terkait Akta Otentik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Hukum Perdata.” Al-Dalil: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, Dan Hukum 2, no. 3 (2024): 32–37.

Ramadhani, Febri. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Di Bawah Tangan Waarmerking Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Recital 2, no. 2020 (2020): 101.

Rofiq, M. Khoirur. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. t.t.

Safira, Martha Eri. Buku Hukum Acara Perdata. 2017.

Soroinda, Disriani Latifah, dan AARS Nasution. “Kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti elektronik dalam hukum acara perdata.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 52, no. 2 (2022): 384–405.

Syamsuddin, Mohammad Syafri. Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dokumen Elektronik Dalam Bentuk Tulisan Dalam Teori Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. 2023.

Yulia, Yulia. Hukum acara perdata. 2018.

Additional Files

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

Arbella, K., & Raudatul Jannah, I. (2026). REKONSTRUKSI KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN AKTA OTENTIK TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 65/Pdt.G/PTA.Bjm. AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v8i1.11670

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8, Nomor 1, Juni 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Karnia Arbella, Ihda Raudatul Jannah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.