MODEL PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BERBASIS KEARIFAN LOKAL PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT RONGKONG DI KABUPATEN LUWU UTARA

Authors

  • Ilyas Ilyas Universitas Mega Buana, Palopo, Indonesia
  • Citra Nasir Universitas Mega Buana, Palopo, Indonesia
  • Nursyamsi Ichsan Universitas Mega Buana, Palopo, Indonesia
  • Nasrah Hasmiati Attas Universitas Mega Buana, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8563-5075

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v8i1.11563

Keywords:

Customary Law; Dispute Resolution; Local Wisdom; Legal Pluralism; Rongkong Community.

Abstract

This study examines the model of dispute resolution based on local wisdom in the indigenous Rongkong community in North Luwu Regency. The existence of customary dispute resolution mechanisms reflects the living law that functions to maintain social harmony. However, the dominance of formal legal systems has led to the marginalization of these local mechanisms. This study aims to identify the forms and mechanisms of customary dispute resolution, analyze their effectiveness, and construct a conceptual model that can be integrated into the national legal system. This research uses an empirical legal method with a socio-legal approach. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews with customary leaders and community members, while secondary data were collected from legal documents and relevant literature. The data were analyzed qualitatively through data reduction, categorization, and interpretation. The results show that dispute resolution in the Rongkong community emphasizes deliberation, consensus, and restoration of social relations. This mechanism is effective in maintaining social order but lacks formal recognition and systematic structure. Therefore, this study proposes a structured model of local wisdom-based dispute resolution that is adaptive and compatible with the national legal framework.

References

Ehrlich, Eugen, Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1936.

Hadikusuma, Hilman, Hukum Adat Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2003.

Marshall, Tony F., Restorative Justice: An Overview, Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate, London, 1999.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Hukum dan Masyarakat, Angkasa, Bandung, 1980.

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006.

Rato, Dominikus, Hukum Adat dalam Perspektif Sosio-Antropologis, LaksBang PRESSindo, Yogyakarta, 2009.

Soekanto, Soerjono, Hukum Adat Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2016.

Soepomo, Bab-Bab tentang Hukum Adat, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1982.

Griffiths, John, “What Is Legal Pluralism?”, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Vol. 18, No. 24, 1986.

Halawa, Darius, “Hukum Adat sebagai Instrumen Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Masyarakat sebagai Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional”, RIO Law Jurnal, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2025.

Lukman Ansar et.al, “Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Sistem Pluralisme Hukum Papua: Telaah Normatif terhadap Peraturan Daerah | AL-AQWAL : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam.” Diakses 5 Mei 2026. https://e-journal.iainfmpapua.ac.id/index.php/alaqwal/article/view/1899.

Sumaya, Pupu Sriwulan, “Keadilan Restoratif dalam Hukum Adat di Indonesia”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2024.

Tyas, Arini Eka Puspa Wahyuning, “Peran Hukum Adat dalam Proses Restorative Justice untuk Penyelesaian Kasus Kejahatan di Masyarakat”, Jurnal Sistem Hukum, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2026.

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-07

How to Cite

Ilyas, I., Nasir, C., Ichsan, N., & Attas, N. H. (2026). MODEL PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BERBASIS KEARIFAN LOKAL PADA MASYARAKAT ADAT RONGKONG DI KABUPATEN LUWU UTARA. AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 8(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v8i1.11563

Citation Check