Judicial Law-Making and the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication: Reassessing Judicial Power in Indonesia after Decision No. 92/PUU-XXII/2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/ajmpi.v11i1.11331Keywords:
Judicial Law-Making, Constitutional Court, Negative and Positive Legislatif, Separation of Powers, Constitutional DemocracyAbstract
This article examines the implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 92/PUU-XXII/2024 for the limits of judicial authority and Indonesia’s constitutional design. The decision not only reviews the constitutionality of Article 118(e) of the Village Law but also formulates an operational norm through conditional interpretation, signaling a functional shift of the Court from its classical role as a negative legislator toward judicial law-making. Employing a doctrinal legal approach with conceptual analysis and limited comparison, the study analyzes the decision, relevant legislation, and constitutional theory literature using qualitative content analysis within the theoretical frameworks of Hans Kelsen, Alec Stone Sweet, Ran Hirschl, and Mark Tushnet. The findings demonstrate that the Court’s normative intervention operates as a corrective mechanism to address legal uncertainty and to protect constitutional rights, while simultaneously generating structural tensions with the principles of separation of powers and democratic accountability. The article argues that the normalization of the Court’s role as a positive legislator risks incrementally altering the institutional balance without sufficient democratic legitimacy. The study’s main contribution lies in integrating national doctrinal analysis with global constitutional debates on the limits of judicial law-making in constitutional democracies, particularly in developing countries with unstable legislative dynamics.
References
Agresto, J. The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy, 2016. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85056689283&partnerID=40&md5=717bc3c5e3a342f048464adb1caa0115.
Agustine, O V, S D Harijanti, I Perwira, and W Wulandari. “Constitutional Review of Criminal Norms: Does Indonesia Need Judicial Activism?” International Journal of Human Rights 27, no. 4 (2023): 772–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2023.2185608.
Amir, Irfan. “Disqualification of the Candidate Pair for the Elected Regional Head of Sabu Raijua Regency” 5, no. 2 (2021): 196–213. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v4i2.1830.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, and Ali Safaat. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2006.
Banaszak, B. “Constitutional Tribunals’ Judicial Review of Public Power in Poland.” In Ius Gentium, 61:243–57, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_13.
Benhabib, S. “Dialogic Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.” Global Constitutionalism 9, no. 3 (2020): 506–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204538172000012X.
Cartabia, M, and E Lamarque. “The Constitutional Justice in Europe (1920-2020).” Quaderni Costituzionali 40, no. 4 (2020): 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1439/99323.
Fajri, Ahmad Nur, and Irfan Amir. “Penegakan Hak Konstitusional Melalui Constitutional Question Serta Relevansinya Terhadap Negara Hukum Pancasila.” Constitutional Law Review 1, no. 1 (2022): 39–56.
Fine Licht, J De, M Agerberg, and P Esaiasson. “It’s Not Over When It’s Over" - Post-Decision Arrangements and Empirical Legitimacy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 32, no. 1 (2022): 183–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab023.
Hapsari, Murti Ayu. “The Dimension of Judicial Activism of Incorporating Constitutional Complaint : An Overview on Judicial Independence.” Constitutional Review 11, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1124.
Hastuti, Proborini. “Shifting the Character of the Constitutional Court Decision Influenced by Political Constellation in Indonesia.” Constitutional Review 5, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev526.
Hirschl, R. “The Global Expansion of Judicial Power.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behaviour, 65–88, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.3.
Hirschl, Ran. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Harvard University Press. Harvard University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15d81nb.
Jaya, R. “URGENSI CHECKS AND BALANCES KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA DAN ISLAM.” Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 18, no. 2 (2019): 221–32. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v18i2.1740.
Kelsen, H. General Theory of Law and State. General Theory of Law and State. Taylor and Francis, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203790960.
Kmiec, Keenan D. “The Origin and Current Meanings of ‘Judicial Activism.’” California Law Review 92, no. 5 (2004): 1441–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481421.
Kuswanto, K, and T S Kurnia. “ABOLISHING THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S ROLE AS POSITIVE LEGISLATURE: A PRELIMINARY STUDY.” Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 10, no. 1 (2025): 164–78. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v10i1.775.
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-XXII/2024 (2024).
Martínez-Barahona, E. “Constitutional Courts and Constitutional Change: Analysing the Cases of Presidential Re-Election in Latin America*.” In New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices, 289–309, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315597904-24.
Maulana, Esty, Irfan Amir, Muspita Sari, and Ismail Aris. “Legal Implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XI/2013 on Simplifying Birth Certificate Registration Procedures in Indonesia.” Constitutional Law Review 3, no. 1 (May 30, 2024): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v3i1.5602.
Mietzner, M. “Political Conflict Resolution and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia: The Role of the Constitutional Court.” Journal of East Asian Studies 10, no. 3 (2010): 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800003672.
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. “Guarding Democracy : Judicial Activism in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Decisions in Regional Head Electoral Disputes.” Constitutional Review 11, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1112.
Muttaqin, Labib, Nuria Siswi Enggarani, Nunik Nurhayati, and M. Junaidi. “Constitutional Court vs. Lawmakers: Positive Legislature, Decision Implementation, and Balance of Authority.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 2 (2026): 1040–57.
Muttaqin, Labib, Andy Omara, Sudjito Atmoredjo, and M Fikri AR. “Is the Legislator in the Constitutional Court? Examining the Tension Between Judiciary and Democracy in Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 10, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v10i1.13494.
Nawawi, Jumriani, and Irfan Amir. “Integration of Constitutional Law and Human Rights : A Comparative Study between Indonesia and South Africa,” n.d.
Saragih, G M, M Nasution, and E.N.A.M. Sihombing. “Judicial Review by the Constitutional Court: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint in the Perspective of Judicial Freedom.” Jurnal Konstitusi 22, no. 1 (2025): 39–65. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2213.
Somefotorono, Pipit, and Besse Sari. “Constitutional Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No . 105 / PUU-XXII / 2024 on Freedom of Expression and Defamation in Indonesia.” Constitutional Law Review 4, no. 2 (2025): 117–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v4i2.5951.
Sugirman, Andi, Irfan Amir, Andri Sutrisno, Agnes Fitryantica, and Sholihin Bone. “Balancing Individual Political Rights and Institutional Integrity in an Islamic Constitutional Perspective on Party Switching in Indonesia.” El -Mashlahah 15, no. 2 (2025): 369–92. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.9995.
Sweet, Alec Stone. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001.
Tarnowska, A. “Constitutional Courts and Representative Democracy- a Kelsenian Perspective.” Comparative Law Review 25 (2019): 277–98. https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2019.010.
Trykhlib, K. “Law-Making Activity in the Case Law of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine.” International and Comparative Law Review 19, no. 2 (2019): 27–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0014.
Tsekov, A. “The Bulgarian Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislator.” In Rule of Law in Crisis: Constitutionalism in a State of Flux, 256–69, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003349501-17.
Tushnet, M. “The Relation Between Political Constitutionalism and Weak-Form Judicial Review.” German Law Journal 14, no. 12 (2013): 2249–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200002753.
———. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, 2009. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84924102337&partnerID=40&md5=edf32e2cc9b7a1f0095f4f2f8afbbd19.
Waltman, J. Principled Judicial Restraint: A Case against Activism. Principled Judicial Restraint: A Case Against Activism, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137486967.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Winda Wahyuni, Multi Sri Asnani , Dirawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
