Politik hukum: menakar kualitas reformasi regulasi dalam central oversight body
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v20i2.1389Keywords:
Oversight, Bureaucracy, Counter Cultural, EvaluationAbstract
Improving the quality of regulatory reform in legal politics, which has implications for the direction of the formation of laws and regulations, demands counter-cultural changes within the regulatory institution itself. External controls and oversight are essential but not sufficient to overcome bureaucratic resistance and the growing philosophy of command and control. A number of approaches have been used through training and dissemination of information, repetition of writing on job descriptions and evaluation criteria, and building reform units, to support the functions of regulatory agencies. This research method is normative juridical, which emphasizes the study of literacy, laws and regulations, books and other related information sources. Juridical analysis shows clearly that bureaucratic reform should be seen as a long-term investment in building effectiveness, not just a solution to actual problems. This understanding will reduce the tendency for dysfunctional products to form regulations, due to the intervention of certain organizational or political interests. The change in the perspective of the bureaucrats in viewing the possible regulations will not be achieved in several decades without seriousness in improving the bureaucracy itself.
Perbaikan kualitas reformasi regulasi dalam politik hukum yang berimplikasi pada arah pembentukkan peraturan perundang-undangan menuntut adanya perubahan counter cultural di dalam badan institusi pengaturan itu sendiri. Kontrol eksternal dan oversight merupakan hal yang penting tetapi tidak cukup untuk mengatasi resistansi birokrasi dan berkembangnya filosofi command and control. Sejumlah pendekatan telah dipergunakan melalui training dan desiminasi informasi, pengulangan penulisan pada job description dan kriteria evaluasi, serta membangun unit reformasi, untuk mendukung fungsi badan pengaturan. Metode penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yaitu menekankan pada studi literasi, peraturan perundang-undangan, buku dan sumber informasi lainya yang masih berkaitan. Analisis yuridis menunjukkan secara jelas bahwa reformasi birokrasi haruslah dipandang sebagai investasi jangka panjang dalam membangun efektifitas, bukan sekedar suatu solusi bagi masalah aktual. Pemahaman ini akan mengurangi kecenderungan disfungsional produk pembentukan peraturan, karena adanya intervensi kepentingan organisasi atau politik tertentu. Perubahan cara pandang para birokrat dalam memandang peraturan kemugkinan tidak akan tercapai dalam beberapa dekade tanpa keseriusan dalam memperbaiki tubuh birokrasi itu sendiri.
References
Bernard L. Tanya, dkk. (2013). Teori Hukum Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi (Cetakan IV). Genta Publishing.
Chandranegara, I. S. (2019). Bentuk-Bentuk Perampingan dan Harmonisasi Regulasi. JH Ius Quia Iustum, 26(3), 435–457.
Dr. Hj. Cindawati, SH., M. . (2014). Filsafat Hukum Etika dan Profesi (Cet-2). CV. Putra Penuntun.
Irfani, N. (2020). Lex superior, lex specialis,. Legislasi Nasional, 16(3), 305–325.
Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas. (2011). Pedoman Penerapan Reformasi Regulasi. In Bappenas (p. 6). Bappenas.
Negara, L. A. (2003). Sistem Administrasi Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia, Buku 1 Prinsip-Prinsip Penyelenggaraan Negara (Pertama). Lembaga Administrasi Negara.
Pranjoto, E. (2013). Modul Khusus Menulis Karya Ilmiah Bidang Hukum (Cet-4). Pustaka Ahklak.
Rakhmawanto, A. (2020). Analisis Politisasi Birokrasi Dalam Pembinaan Aparatur Sipil Negara. Civil Service, 14(2), 1–12.
Riswanto, A. (2016). Strategi Politik-Hukum Meningkatkan Kualitas Kinerja DPR Ri Dalam Produktivitas Legislasi Nasional. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 4(2), 267–286.
Rosadi, O. (2010). Hukum Kodrat, Pancasila Dan Asas Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(3), 282–290.
Sukardi. (2016). Pengawasan dan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah. Genta Publishing.
Yusnidar, Amrizal, M. (2019). Pegawai Negeri Sipil Antara Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dosen Dengan Peraturan. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 7(2), 35–47.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.





