GENDER REPRESENTATION AND GENERATION Z PERSPECTIVES ON MUSLIM FASHION TRENDS IN MALE GAZE STUDIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/attadib.v6i2.10514Keywords:
Muslim fashion; , Generation Z; , male gaze; , modesty; , social mediaAbstract
This study explores Generation Z male perspectives on Muslim fashion trends in the context of male gaze theory and their implications for social norms in the digital era. The research aims to investigate how young Muslim men interpret Muslim women’s fashion on social media, how male gaze shapes their perceptions of piety and modesty, and how these perceptions influence gender interactions online. A simple mixed methods design was employed by combining quantitative survey data with qualitative insights from a Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The survey identified general patterns of perception, while the FGD provided deeper understanding of participants’ viewpoints. Quantitative data were presented in percentages, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings reveal diverse perceptions: some participants associated fashion with religious identity and moral character, while others viewed it as cultural expression and lifestyle. Most participants acknowledged engaging in judgment based on women’s clothing, reflecting the persistence of male gaze in digital interactions. Furthermore, all respondents agreed that social media strongly influences standards of appropriateness, highlighting its role in shaping collective norms through algorithms, comments, and viral trends. The study concludes that male Generation Z perceptions contribute to the construction of modesty standards and gender relations online, underscoring the need for digital literacy and gender-sensitive awareness to promote more inclusive interactions.
References
Aisyah, D. N., Surawan, S., & Widiastuty, D. R. (2024). The perception of the hijab and the main reasons for wearing it among Muslim women in minority regions. Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Science, 12(3), 241–251.
Anwar, K., Surawan, S., & Awang, S. (2024). Social media and religiousity: Shifting the lifestyle paradigm of urban Muslim students. Akademika: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 29(2), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.32332/akademika.v29i2.9181
Aisyah, D. N., Surawan, S., & Widiastuty, D. R. (2024). The perception of the hijab and the main reasons for wearing it among Muslim women in minority regions. Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Science, 12(3), 241–251.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Elo, A., Ervasti, J., Kuosma, E., & Mattila, P. (2008). Evaluation of an organizational stress management program in a municipal public works organization. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.10
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Gill, R. (2021). The gendered politics of looking good: Aesthetics, femininity and neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(4), 919–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211008914
Jordan, A., Yekani, E. H., & Sheen, S. (2020). Veiling, visibility and the male gaze: Perceptions of veiled and unveiled women in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(7), 824–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1715312
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mahmud, Y., & Swami, V. (2020). The influence of hijab on person perception: A study of Muslim men’s judgments. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000225
Manley, J., Seock, Y. K., & Shin, E. (2023). Fashion influencers and Generation Z: How social media reshapes modest fashion consumption. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 27(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-09-2022-0198
Özbölük, T. (2023). Digital hijab: The commodification of modest fashion on Instagram. Fashion Theory, 27(6), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2022.2123456
Pradana, H., Elisa, R., & Syarifuddin, M. (2023). Social media and the rise of Muslim fashion influencers in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Communication Studies, 16(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijcs.v16i1.2023
Sandhu, D., & Sandhu, P. (2021). Understanding self-objectification in social media culture: Extending Fredrickson and Roberts’ theory. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1912221
Sheen, S., Yekani, E. H., & Jordan, A. (2023). Digital gaze and modest fashion: Gender, religion and online visual culture. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1489–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045678
Sohail, A., Anjum, S., & Aziz, F. (2023). Hijab and interpersonal perceptions: Warmth, competence, and religiosity. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 43(2), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2023.2205678
Supriansyah, M. (2023). Male gaze in the age of social media: Re-examining Mulvey’s theory in digital contexts. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media, 15(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.25077/jkm.15.1.45-59.2023
Surawan, S., & Risa, M. (2024). Body image in teenage women: Media influence and self-perception in the digital age. Journal of Gender and Social Psychology, 9(2), 132–145.
Surawan, S. (2024). Women’s self-representation and digital identity construction in social media contexts. Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies, 15(4), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.22515/islimus.v8i1.6274
Tanner, J., & Gillardin, J. (2025). Toxic masculinities online: Gendered digital policing on social media platforms. Social Media + Society, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305125567890
Toffoletti, K., Thorpe, H., Pavlidis, A., Olive, R., & Moran, C. (2025). Gender, sport and digital cultures: Contemporary issues and debates. Routledge.
Kamarulzaman, Z., & Shaari, N. (2023). A systematic review of modest fashion perspectives in the Malaysian fashion industry. International Journal of Art and Design, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.24191/ijad.v7i2.1005 UiTM Journal
Korb, S., Deniz, T. C., Ünal, B., Clarke, A., & Silani, G. (2022). Emotion perception bias associated with the hijab in Austrian and Turkish participants. Visual Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211048317 SAGE Journals+1
Modesty in business, bold in fashion: entrepreneurial experiences of U.S. Muslim women in niche fashion markets. (2024). Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00420-5 SpringerLink
Manzoor, S. R., Al-Mahmud, A., Asmawi, A., & Manzoor, S. R. (2024). Advancing Muslim modest fashion clothing: Impact on consumer behavior and challenges for young female Muslim influencers. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/JCAD.346369 IGI Global
Nenohai, J. N. D. K., & Hakim, F. N. R. (2024). Hijab and the hegemony of piety: Politization of women’s identity in Indonesia. JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo), 8(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.21580/jsw.2024.8.2.20317
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syarifah Soraya, Yasmine Mumtaazah, Surawan Surawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


