ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN TATA KELOLA KEUANGAN DALAM MEWUJUDKAN GOOD UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE DI IAIN SULTAN AMAI GORONTALO

Sri Dewi Yusuf -  Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
Rizal Darwis* -  Fakultas Syariah IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
Zulaeha Zulaeha -  Pascasarjana IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI : 10.30863/al-tsarwah.v6i1.4712

Budget is important in an institution or organization. This article aims to examine financial management policies in realizing Good University Governance at the Islamic State Institute (IAIN) of Sultan Amai Gorontalo. This research is field research using a financial economics approach and public management. Data collection comes from primary data sources in the form of interviews with IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo academics, and primary data sources in the form of literature studies related to financial management. Furthermore, the data were processed and analyzed with descriptive qualitative. The results of the study show that financial management at IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo is guided by the principles of Good University Governance, namely: participation, having a legal basis/rule, transparency, service, mutual agreement orientation, equality, efficiency and effectiveness, accountability, and strategic vision
Keywords
Budget; Finance; Good University Governance
  1. Andrianto, N. (2007). Transparasi dan Akuntabilitas Publik Melalui E-Government. Malang: Bayumedia Publisher.
  2. Ariani, D. (2010). “Pengelolaan Keuangan Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia.” dalam https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/289793031.pdf
  3. Astuti, Rini, et.al. (2022). Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Cet. I; Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada.
  4. Bastian, I. 2002. “Sistem Akuntansi Sektor Publik” Modul Pelatihan Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit BPFE.
  5. Carnagie, G. D. (2009). The ABC of University Governance. Campus Review, 19, no. 9.
  6. Considine, D. (2004). “University Governance, Corporations and Culture: The Impact of Corporate Law on the Development of Appropriate Regulation, Compliance and Recognition of Diverse University Cultures.” Paper Proceedings of the Australian University Quality Forum, Adelaide, 9.
  7. Creswell, John W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran. Edisi IV. Cet. I; Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  8. Harris, J., dan G. Cunningham. (2009). “The Time are Changing: A Call for Governing Boards of Universities to Awaken to Sarbanes-Oxley and Practices of Good Governance.” Decision Line, 40 (5), 21.
  9. Helaluddin dan Hengki Wijaya (2019). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Sebuah Tinjauan Teori & Praktik. Edisi I. Cet. I; Makassar: Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray.
  10. Lussiana, T. Mildawati, dan Fidiani. (2019). “Dekonstruksi Konsep Good University Governance dalam Pelaksanaan Anggaran Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum.” Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi 22, no. 2.
  11. Mahmudi. (2007). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Penertbit Andi.
  12. Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Edisi Empat. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
  13. Putrika, K. E., dan Putri, I. G. A. M. A D. (2021). “Penerapan Good University Governance terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa dengan Excellent Service sebagai Variabel Moderasi.” Jurnal Akuntansi 31, no. 11.
  14. Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.
  15. Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
  16. Sugiyono (2014). Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  17. Sedarmayanti. (2009). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Cet. III; Bandung: Mandar Maju.
  18. Wijaya, Andy Fefta dan Oscar Rdyan Danar. (2014). Manajemen Publik: Teori dan Praktik. Malang. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2023-06-14
Published: 2023-09-25
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 76 53