Iswandi Iswandi* -  , Indonesia
Gibran Abdullah - 

DOI : 10.30863/jad.v3i1.523

The election of a president and vice president is a fundamental way to fill thevacuum of power. However, in the 2019 presidential election, a striking phenomenon with the involvement of religion in the political contest, so that there are many pros and cons if it does not suitable withthe desire of each religious elite in the 2019 presidential election.The involvement of religion in the presidential election raises questions such as, first, how religion was involved in the presidential election process; Second, how religious discourse takes place in legitimating a particular process in the presidential election; and Third, how does religious involvement in the presidential election bring consequences to the life of society as a whole.

The method used in this paper is a qualitative method. The qualitative method is often referred  as the generic qualitative method which is to find out several indications of the 2019 presidential election with the involvement of religion as a marker of identity. While the primary data source obtained from various online media in the form of writing, or in the form of direct coverage, and analysis of the author's using descriptive analysis.

During presidential election, the religious elite consider emotional feeling as a priority so that they come out of the core problem. So that religion in the presidential election is only an instrument of political interests and can not be avoided again through movements that ultimately lead to pros and cons among fellow religious elites. Thus the professionalism of religion will be difficult to create because it is caused by religious elites who legitimize religion into the practical politics.

Religious Issues; Presidential Election; Politic
  1. Abdillah, Masykuri. 2013. “Hubungan Agama Dan Negara Dalam Konteks Modernisasi Politik Di Era Reformasi.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 13(2): 247–58.
  2. Akhsan, M.F. (2015). Penggunaan Term dan Simbol Islam sebagai Iklan Politik di Televisi Pada Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2014 (Studi pada TV One dan Metro TV selama Masa Kampanye Pemilu tahun 2014 di Bulan Maret sampai Bulan Juli). (Tesis).
  3. Aminah, S. (2015). Political Branding Menggunakan Simbol Keagamaan dalam Iklan Politik PKB di Televisi. (Skripsi).
  4. Cahill, L.S. (1995). “Playing God”: Religious Symbols in Public Places. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 20, 341-346.
  5. Chalik, Abdul. 2010. Religion and Local Politics Exploring the Subcultures and the Political Participation of East Java NU Elites in the Post-New Order Era. Journal of Indonesian Islam; ISSN1978-6301. Published by the Institute for the Study of Religion and Society (LSAS) and the Postgraduate Program (PPs), the State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya–Indonesia
  6. Gerges, F.A. (2013). The Islamist Moment: From Islamic State to Civil Islam? Political Science Quarterly, 128(3), 389-426.
  7. Hossain, A.A. (2012). Islamic Resurgence in Bangladesh’s Culture and Politics: Origins, Dynamics and Implications. Journal of Islamic Studies, 23(2), 165-198.
  8. Isnaini, Ahmad. 2017. “Kekerasan Atas Nama Agama.” Kalam 8(2): 213.
  9. Jati, Wasisto Raharjo. 2014. Agama dan Politik: Teologi Pembebasan sebagai Arena Profetisasi Agama. Walisongo, Volume 22, Nomor 1, Mei 2014
  10. Kingsley, Jeremy J. 2012. Peacemakers or Peace-Breakers?Provincial Elections and Religious Leadership in Lombok, Indonesia. Indonesia, No. 93 (April 2012), pp. 53-82. Southeast Asia Program Publications at Cornell University
  11. Kurniawan, Budi. 2018. “Politisasi Agama Di Tahun Politik : Politik Pasca-Kebenaran Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Sosiologi Agama - 12(1): 133–54.
  12. Loretta Dell’Aguzzo & Ester Sigillò. (2017). Political legitimacy and variations in state-religion relations in Tunisia, The Journal of North African Studies, DOI: 10.1080/13629387.2017.1340841
  13. Macapagal, E.J., dkk. (2018). The Unifying and Divisive Effects of Social Identities: Religious and Ethnopolitical Identities among Mindanao Muslims in the Philippines. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12(28), 1-12. DOI: 10.1017/prp.2018.16.
  14. Martinez, P.A. (2001). The Islamic State or the State of Islam in Malaysia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 23(3), 474-503.
  15. Miles, W. (2000). Muslim Ethnopolitics and Presidential Elections in Nigeria. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 20(2), 229-241.
  16. Nugroho, Kris. 2011. Ikhtiar Teoritik Mengkaji Peran Partai dalam Mobilisasi Politik Elektoral. Tahun 2011, Volume 24, Nomor 3 Hal: 202-214. Departemen Politik, Universitas Airlangga
  17. Nurhadi, Sunarso. 2018. Peran Kiai dalam Membangun Partisipasi Pemilih.Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Vol. 3, Nomor 2, Desember 2018.
  18. Olson, L.R. & Warber, A.L. (2008). Belonging, Behaving, and Believing: Assessing the Role of Religion on Presidential Approval. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 192-204.
  19. Reilly, B. (2002). Electoral Systems for Divided Societies. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 156-170.
  20. Schwedler, J. (1998). A Paradox of Democracy? Islamist Participation in Elections. Middle East Report, 209(25), 25-29.
  21. Suryadinata, L. (1997). Golkar of Indonesia: Recent Developments. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 19(2), 190-204.
  22. Vel, Jacqueline A.C. 2008. An Ethnography of Democratization in West Sumba, Indonesia, 1986-2006. Published by: Brill. (2008). Stable URL:
  23. Willnat, L. dkk. (2017). Symbols, Slogans, and Charisma: Political Posters in India’s 2014 National Election. Dalam C. Holtz-Bacha & B. Johansson (Eds.). Election Posters Around the Globe (pp.187-209). Swiss: Springer International Publishing AG.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2019-11-30
Published: 2020-05-08
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 567 561