AN ANALYSIS OF HUMOR IN “MARIO TEGUH GOLDEN WAYS” TALK SHOW

Wahyu Wahyu* -  Fakultas Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone, Indonesia

DOI : 10.35673/ajdsk.v6i1.840

Abstract

The use of humor is considered as one of the most important things in social communication. In this case, the writer analyzed the humor expressions appeared in a famous talk show in Indonesia, Mario Teguh Golden Ways. The research is focused on the types of humor expressed by Mario and the audiences during the show. The method of this study was descriptive qualitative since the researcher intended to obtain the conversations among the keynote speaker and participants. . The data were taken from the video of the talk show. The research subjects of this study are the keynote speaker and participants of the talk show Mario teguh golden ways “how to begin to be a richman” episode. The data collections were done as follows: first, the researcher downloaded the videos and transcribed of The Mario teguh talk show. Second, the researcher observed the videos; compared the videos and the transcriptions. Later, the researcher transcribed the parts of the transcription that contain humor to be analyzed further. The findings show that there are many humorous expressions appeared during the show. There are seven extracts which is divided into three classifications of humor; they are irony, teasing and joking. None of the humor expression can be categorized as banter or language play. All of the humor expressions are conceptual humor.

Keywords – Conversation, Humor expression, talk show

 

  1. Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay, and Isabella Poggi. “Multimodal Markers of Irony and Sarcasm.” Humor 16, no. 2 (2003): 243–60.
  2. Attenborough, Frederick. “Jokes, Pranks, Blondes and Banter: Recontextualising Sexism in the British Print Press.” Journal of Gender Studies 23, no. 2 (2014): 137–54.
  3. Belz, Julie A. “Second Language Play as a Representation of the Multicompetent Self in Foreign Language Study.” Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 1, no. 1 (2002): 13–39.
  4. Haiman, John. Talk Is Cheap: Sarcasm, Alienation, and the Evolution of Language. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1998.
  5. Lefcourt, Herbert M, Rod A Martin, and Wendy E Saleh. “Locus of Control and Social Support: Interactive Moderators of Stress.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, no. 2 (1984): 378.
  6. Lerner, Jennifer S, and Dacher Keltner. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, no. 1 (2001): 146.
  7. Lilja, Niina, and Arja Piirainen-Marsh. “Connecting the Language Classroom and the Wild: Re-Enactments of Language Use Experiences.” Applied Linguistics 40, no. 4 (2019): 594–623.
  8. Muqun, Wang, and Wang Lu. “The Functions of Humor in Classroom Instruction,” 2007.
  9. Norrick, Neal R. Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Indiana University Press, 1993.
  10. Piirainen-Marsh, Arja. “Bilingual Practices and the Social Organisation of Video Gaming Activities.” Journal of Pragmatics 42, no. 11 (2010): 3012–30.
  11. Plester, Barbara A, and Janet Sayers. “‘Taking the Piss’: Functions of Banter in the IT Industry.” Walter de Gruyter, 2007.
  12. Provine, Robert R. Laughter: A Scientific Investigation. Penguin, 2001.
  13. Tahir, Saidna Zulfiqar Bin, and D U I Buru. “Humor in ‘Bukan Empat Mata’ Talk Show.” Jurnal JUPITER 5, no. 4 (2012): 68–74.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-06-30
Published: 2020-06-30
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 317 584