DEBAT CAPRES CAWAPRES DALAM PERSPEKTIF SYARIAT ISLAM ( TINJAUAN ANALISIS SEMIOTIKA DEBAT CAPRES CAWAPRES PEMILU 2019)

A.Nur Aisyah Rusnali* -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone, Indonesia

DOI : 10.35673/ajdsk.v5i2.582

Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to find out how the debate of the Capres and
Cawapres 2019, and to explore the view of Islamic Shari'a on the debates of
the Capres and Cawapres 2019, is reviewed from a semiotic communication
study. The research method used is qualitative with a semiotic
communication approach. Semiotics is about the meaning of signs, markers,
and signs. The debate in human life is a humane thing to happen. Because all
mankind can't have the same thoughts. Depending on humans, the debate
itself is. As is the case in determining the president's choice. Law in the
ability of debate or discussion, Islam has arranged it in such away. , Islamic
law on the debate is not to do debate only for pleasure, it occurs in the debate
program of 2019 candidate. The debate Program is carried out not for
pleasure alone, but accompanied by a good purpose, namely to make the
community more familiar with the character of each candidate President and
vice president, so that they easily determine the choice.
Keywords: the candidate debate,Islamic Sharia, Semiotics.

  1. Brannen, Julia. (2002). Memadu Metode Penelitian: Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Cet
  2. III; Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
  3. Cangara, Hafied. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Cet. XIV; Jakarta :
  4. Rajawali Pers.
  5. ________. (2014). Komunikasi Politik, konsep, teori dan strategi edisi Revisi .Cet.
  6. IV; Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  7. Kriyantono, Rachmat. (2019). Ilmu Komunikasi. Filsafat dan Etika Ilmunya serta
  8. Perspektif Islam. Cet.Pertama. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  9. Masyuri dan M. Zainuddin. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian : Pendekatan Praktis
  10. dan Aplikatif. Cet. III; Bandung : PT Rafika Aditama.
  11. Nimmo, Dan. (2004). Komunikasi Politik.Komunikator, Pesan dan Media. Cet.V;
  12. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosda Karya.
  13. Nimmo, Dan. (2006). Komunikasi Politik.Khalayak dan Efek. Cet.IV; Bandung:
  14. PT.Remaja Rosda Karya.
  15. Piliang,Yasraf Amir. (2003). Hipersemiotika Tafsir Cultural Studie Atas Matinya
  16. Makna..Yogyakarta : Jalasutra.
  17. Sobur, Alex. (2006). Analisis Teks Media Suatu Pengantar Untuk Analisis
  18. Wacana, Analisis Semiotik, dan Analisis Framing. Cet. IV; Jakarta:
  19. Kencana.
  20. Subiakto,Henry dan Rhamah Ida. (2012). Komunikasi Politik, media dan
  21. Demokrasi, Edisi kedua. Cet. II; Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  22. Suwartono. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Cet. I; Yogyakarta :
  23. Andi.
  24. Referensi Lain
  25. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pemilihan_umum_di_Indonesia
  26. https://kbbi.web.id/syariat.html.
  27. https://pengertiandefinisi.com/pengertian-syariah-menurut-para-pakar/

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-01-13
Published: 2019-12-31
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 344 1276