From Judicial Restraint to Judicial Activism: A Comparison of Decisions Number 30-74/PUU-XII/2014 and 22/PUU-XV/2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/al-bayyinah.v9i2.10396Keywords:
Constitutional court; shift; judicial restraint; judicial activism.Abstract
In the case review of decision Number 30-74/PUU-XII/2014 and 22/PUU-XV/2017, the Constitutional Court experienced a shift from judicial restraint to judicial activism. The object of the case being tested was Article 7, paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law relating to the age limit for marriage. Article 7, paragraph 7 (1) of the Marriage Law is an open legal policy. In practice, the Constitutional Court applies the principle of judicial restraint as stated in the decision 30-74/PUU-XII/2014. This is different from decision 22/PUU-XV/2017. This essay formulates the shift in the Constitutional Court's stance from judicial restraint to judicial activism. The change in the Constitutional Court's stance opens up important questions regarding the consistency and limits of its authority in a state of law and living constitution in the Constitutional Court's decisions. This research uses a regulatory approach (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The results of this study are the differences in legal considerations in decisions 30-74/PUU-XII/2014 and 22/PUU-XV/2017. These differences arise in legal considerations and verdicts. Second, the shift of the Constitutional Court from judicial restraint to judicial activism is marked by differences in viewing the testing of open legal policies, the form of progressiveness of the Constitutional Court, and judicial activism in enforcing justice in a limited manner. Third, the living constitution theory requires the Constitutional Court to re-interpret the Constitutional Court's powers within the Constitution. This interpretation must be in line with the legal needs of society, particularly in the context of the age limit for marriage.
References
Arthur, Megan, Alison Earle, Amy Raub, Ilona Vincent, Efe Atabay, Isabel Latz, Gabriella Kranz, et al. “Child Marriage Laws around the World : Minimum Marriage Age , Legal Exceptions , and Gender Disparities Child Marriage Laws around the World : Minimum Marriage Age , Legal Exceptions , and Gender Disparities.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2017.1375786.
Asro, M. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan 11, no. 2 (2019): 151–64. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v11i2.4857.
Basari, Taufik. “The Challenge of Embracing Human Rights as A Fundamental Element of Constitutionalism: A Study of Indonesia’s Constitutional Journey.” Journal of Posthumanism 5, no. 6 (2025).
Christian, Jordy Herry, and Kirana Edenela. “Terampasnya Hak-Hak Perempuan Akibat Diskriminasi Batas Usia Perkawinan.” Lex Scientia Law Review 3, no. 1 (2019): 1–14.
Danil, Muhammad, Chabibatul Maulidah, and Melia Rosa. “Constitutional Court Decision in Indonesia Reformasi Undang-Undang Perkawinan Melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 4 (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2147.
Dramanda, W. “Menggagas Penerapan Judicial Restraint Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 4 (2014): 617–31.
E. Zaenal Muttaqin. “Konsep Pemisahan Kekuasaan (Separation Of Power) Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945 Antara Lembaga Eksekutif Dan Legislatif.” Al Qisthâs; Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik 6, no. 1 (1945): 14–31.
Efendi, Muhammad Fadli. “Mekanisme Legislative Review Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum.” Veritas et Justitia 7, no. 2 (2021): 406–30. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i2.4215.
Fauzani, Muhammad Addi, and Muhammad Basrun. “Living Constitution in Indonesia : The Study of Constitutional Changes Without A Formal Amendment.” Lentera Hukum 7, no. 1 (2020): 69–84.
Halim, Fajri. “Analysis of the Formation of Government Regulations as Separation of Powers in Indonesia.” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi 5, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i2.901.
Hananta, Dwi. “Pertimbangan Keadaan-Keadaan Meringankan Dan Memberatkan Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana / Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances Consideration on Sentencing.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 1 (2018): 87. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.1.2018.87-108.
Hofi, Moh. Ali. “Judicial Review Satu Atap Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Refleksi Terhadap Problematika Dan Tantangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia.” HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2021): 133–48.
Hamzah, Hamzah. "Telaah Maqasid Syariah Terhadap Putusan Mk No. 22/Puu-Xv/2017 Tentang Batas Usia Nikah." AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 1.1 (2019): 61-84. https://doi.org/10.35673/as-hki.v1i1.2678
Johansyah, Johansyah. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat (Binding).” Solusi 19, no. 2 (2021): 165–82. https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v19i2.359.
Lailam, Tanto, and Nita Andrianti. “Legal Policy of Constitutional Complaints in Judicial Review: A Comparison of Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Indonesia.” Bestuur Journal 11, no. 1 (2023).
Mahkamah Konstitusi. 30-74/PUU-XII/2014 (2014).
Mahkamah, Konstitusi. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 22/PUUU-XV/2017 (2017).
Mantara Sukma, Gardha Galang. “Open Legal Policy Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Bidang Politik Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Terhadap Putusan MK Bidang Politik Tahun 2015-2017).” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss1.art1.
Maslul, Syaifullahil. “Judicial Restraint Dalam Pengujian Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Yudisial 15, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i3.496.
Maslul, Syaifullahil. "Progresifitas Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Batasan Usia Perkawinan." Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 12.1 (2022): 127-140.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Teoritis Dan Praktek Pradilan. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2007.
Omara, Andy. “Preventing Abusive Constitutionalism in Indonesia.” Constitutional Review 11, no. 1 (2025).
Pratiwi, Wiwit, and Sherly Nelsa Fitri. “The Implication of Presidential Threshold as an Open Legal Policy in Indonesia’s General Election.” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research And Analysis 06, no. 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i11-09.
Purnomo, Agus, Nor Salam, Mukhammad Zamzami, and Abu Bakar. “Dimensions Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘Ah and Human Rights in The Constitutional Court’s Decision on Marriage Age Difference in Indonesia.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 3 (2023).
Putra, Ilhamdi, and Khairul Fahmi. “Karakteristik Ne Bis In Idem Dan Unsurnya Dalam Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 2 (2021): 345. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1824.
Radita Ajie. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legislation) Vol. 13, no. No.2 Juni (2016): 111–20.
Rismana, Daud, Mabarroh Azizah, Ninik Zakiyah, and Abdul Rahim Hakimi. “The Controversy on the Minimum Age for Marriage in Indonesia : Factors and Implications.” Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) 2, no. 1 (2024).
Rizqi, Alda Rifada. “Menakar Progresifitas Lembaga Peradilan Dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi Berintegritas.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 12, no. 2 (2018).
Samosir, Daniel. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Menyebabkan Materi Muatan Undang-Undang Bertentangan Dengan UUD 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 4 (2015).
Sarip, and Nur Rahman. “Separation Of Power: Berpisah Untuk Bertemu.” Jurnal De Jure 4, no. 2 (2020): 53–65.
Soehino. Hukum Tata Negara : Teknik Perundang-Undangan. Yogyakarta: Liberty Jogjakarta, 1990.
Sugiman. “Fungsi Legislasi DPR Pasca Amandemen UUD NKRI 1945.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 10, no. 2 (2020): 173–82. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.468.
Sukadi, Imam. “Asas Contrarius Actus Sebagai Kontrol Pemerintah Terhadap Kebebasan Berserikat Dan Berkumpul Di Indonesia.” Mimbar Keadilan 12, no. 2 (2019): 181. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v12i2.2457.
Sukawati, I Ketut, and Lanang Putra. “Legal Policy in the Decision of the Constitutional Court and the Formation of Law.” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11, no. 12 (2023).
Wibowo, Mardian. “Menakar Konstitusionalitas Sebuah Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 196. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1221.
Yani, Ahmad. “Analisis Konstruksi Struktural Dan Kewenangan DPR Dalam Fungsi Legislasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 2 (2018): 348. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1526.
Yulia, Yulia. "DAMPAK PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 46 PUU-VIII/2010 TENTANG KEABSAHAN STATUS ANAK DI LUAR NIKAH PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA ISLAM." Al-Bayyinah 2.1 (2018): 57-72. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v2i1.39
Yusuf, Muh. “Fungsi Legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Clavia: Jurnal Of Law 17, no. 1 (2019): 49–62.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syaifullahil Maslul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
