EFL LEARNERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON THEIR ENGANGEMENT THROUGH HYBRID LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v23i1.6371Keywords:
Perspectives, Learners’ Engagements, Hybrid learning.Abstract
The present research explores the perspectives of EFL students at IAIN Bone on their engagement in hybrid learning, concentrating on their perceptions and experiences. This research uses qualitative techniques, such as interviews, and observations, to collect information from EFL students engaged in hybrid courses. The results provide light on the attitudes of the learners regarding hybrid learning. The results of this research, the researchers found that there were four learners engagement after doing the observation, they were: personal, academic, intellectual and social engagement. (1) Learners’ personal engagement included things like their needs in learning style, experiences, readiness, hopes, attention, and motivation in learning. (2) Learners’ academic engagement includes organizing, managing time efficiently and their critical thinking. (3) Learners’ intellectual engagement included the frequently of the first quality that lecturer mention when discussing the lessons they have learned from. (4) Learners’ social engagement included learner's capacity to foster relationships and create communities. On the other hand, the result of interviews, it showed that the learners’ perspectives on their engagement toward hybrid learning such as: hybrid learning is flexible and effective, hybrid learning is interactive learning, it can access digital resources and adjust learners’ need, it integrated synchronous and asynchronous learning techniques.
References
Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088
Alfiras, M., Nagi, M., Bojiah, J., & Sherwani, M. (2021). Learners’ perceptions of hybrid classes in the context of Gulf University: An analytical study. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48(5), 181–188.
Anderman, E. ., & Patrik, H. (2012). Achievemnt Goal Theory, Conceptualization of Ability/Intelligence of Classroom climate. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Procedia Social and Behaviour Sciences.
Ary, Donald et al. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education, 8th Edition. United States : WADSWORTH CENGAGE Learning.
Awaludin, F. A., Junid, R. A., Karim, R. A., Zaidi, A., Raslee, N. N., & Shuhaimi, F. L. (2023). Exploring university learners’ perspectives on hybrid learning within the context of post Covid-19 in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(1), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/16314
Blanka, F.K & Jaroslav, K. (2014). Hybrid Learning And Its Current Role In The Teaching Of Foreign Language. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 182 (2015) 477-481
Biddix, J. P., Chung, C.J., & Park, H.W. (2015). The Hybrid shift: Evidencing a student-driven restructuring of the college classroom. Computers&Education,80,162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.016
Chen, P., Lambert, A., & Guidry, K. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222– 1232. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Coates, H 2008, Attracting, Engaging And Retaining: New Conversations About Learning.
Cook, V. (2008). Second Language learning and teaching. London: Hodder Education.
Cowan, R. (2012). The lecturers’ grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ensa, Johnson, Refilwe Morwane, Shakila Dada, Gaby Pretorious & Marena Lotriet. (2018). Adult Learners’ Perspective on Their Engagement in a Hybrid Learning Postgraduate Programme. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66:2, 88-105.
Ginting Daniel. (2021). Student Engagement, Factors, and Methods Affecting Active Learning in English Language Teaching. Voices of English Language Education Society.
Halliday, M.A.K, 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edw.
Handoko, H., & Waskito, W. (2018). Blended Learning: Konsep dan Penerapannya. In Blended Learning: Konsep dan Penerapannya (Vol. 5, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.25077/car.64.60
Hassan, I., Madarina Abdul Rahman, A., & Nazri Latiff Azmi, M. (2021). Development of English Writing Skills through Blended Learning among ESL Learners in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 7(1), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call7.26
Hertzog, N. B., & Kaplan, S. (2016). Intellectual Engagement. Gifted Child Today, 39(3), 133–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516644816
Johnson, E., Morwane, R., Dada, S., Pretorius, G., & Lotriet, M. (2018). Adult Learners’ Perspectives on Their Engagement in a Hybrid Learning Postgraduate Programme. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2018.1469071
Klimova, B. F., & Kacetl, J. (2015). Hybrid Learning and its current role in the teaching of foreign languages. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 182, 477-481.
Lee, G., Fong,W. W., & Gordon, J. (2013). Blended learning: The View Is Different from Student, Teacher, or Institution Perspective. In Hybrid Learning and Continuing education (pp.356-363). Essay, Springer nature.
Lundberg, C. A., & Seridan, . (2015). Benefits of Engagement with peers, faculty and diversity for online learners. College Teaching, 63(1), 8-15.
Major, C. H. (2015). Teaching Online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Milman, N. B., & Wessmiller, J. (2016). Motivating the online learner using Keller's ARCS model. Distance Learning, 13(2), 67-71.
Nashir, Muhammad, Dan Roudlotun Nurul Laili. “Hybrid Learning As An Effective Learning Solution On Intensive English Program In The New Normal Era†9, No. 2 (2021): 13.
Orlich, Donald C., et al., Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction, Ninth Edition, Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.
Peng, W. (2017). Research on model of student engagement in online learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2869–2882. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00723a
Pittaway, S. M. (2012). Student and staff engagement: Developing an engagement framework in a faculty of education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n4.8
Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. (pp. 325-346). Procedia.
Redmond, P., Abawi, L. A., Brown, A., Henderson, R., & Heffernan, A. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Richards, Jack C, Platt, John and Weber, Heidi, (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. England ,Longman House, Burnt Mill, Harlow
Richards, Jack, J.C,(2008). Methodology in Language Teaching. An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, C. 2012. Student engagement: What does this mean in prctice in the context of higher education institutions, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol.4,no.2,pp.94-108.
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World. In Journal of Educational Technology Systems (Vol. 50, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
Wahyu, I. G., Antara, S., Andre, K., & Dewantara, K. (2022). Scrapbook digital: kebutuhan media pembelajaran digital berorientasi HOTS di sekolah dasar. 5(1), 71–76.
Zamzami, Z., & K, C. M. (2018). Blended Learning Method Within Indonesian Higher Education Institutions. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 6(2), 69–77.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
