Notary social responsibility in making deeds for disordered communities

Authors

  • Wahyu Andriawan Narotama Surabaya University
  • Nynda Fatmawati Octarina Narotama Surabaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v21i2.3409

Keywords:

Deed, Notary, Destitute People, Social Responsibility

Abstract

This study aims to find out the legal provisions related to the determination of the notary's honorarium which has been regulated by law, the social responsibility of the notary in helping to make deeds for people who can't afford it, and the legal sanctions for a notary who refuses to provide services to people who can't afford it. This research is normative juridical research with a literature review approach to legislation which is analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that a notary is a state official who is authorized to provide notary services to the public in general so that he is not paid by the state, but he can collect honorarium from his client in the amount as stipulated by UUJN and also based on an agreement between the notary and his client; the notary is also obliged to provide free services to people who cannot afford to pay the honorarium because this is their obligation as stipulated in Article 37 UUJN; and a notary who refuses to provide free services to people who can't afford it, he will be subject to sanctions in the form of a written warning, temporary dismissal, honorable discharge, or dishonorable discharge. 

References

Abukasi, F.K..Sanksi Hukum Bagi Notaris Akibat Tidak Melaksanakan Kewajiban Memberikan Jasa Hukum Di Bidang Kenotariatan Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu., Lex Perivatum, IX.3, 130–39.

Budi, M.A. (2016). Peranan Notaris Dalam Pendidikan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat, Jurnal Advokasi, 277–86.

Farizal, M., Majid, A., Kawuryan, E.S. (2022). Urgensi Pengaturan Honorarium Notaris Untuk Kewenangan Selain Membuat Akta Autentik', Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, (7) 1, 198-205.

Gunawan, I.K.A., Sumardika, I.N., dan Widiati, I.A. (2020). Penetapan Honorarium Notaris Dalam Praktik Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris’, Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1.2, 369–73 <https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2547.369-373>.

Kusuma, AANPS, & Bagastra, I.N. (2022).Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Tidak Memungut Honorarium Pada Para Pihak’, ACTA COMITAS Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, (7),1.

Laytno, V.Y., dan Setiabudhi, I.K.R.,(2019). Sinkronisasi Pengaturan Honorarium Jasa Notaris antara UUJN dengan Kode Etik Notaris’, Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(1).

Ningsih, A, Faisal A.R., dan Adwani. (2019). Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Mediator Sengketa Kenotariatan Terkait Dengan Kewajiban Penyuluhan Hukum’, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, (13).2 , <https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.v13.201-228>

Nurlete, M., Wiryomartani, W., dan Suryadono, W. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Palsu Berdasarkanpelanggaran Jenis Norma Dan Sanksinya’, Indonesian Notary, (02), 03.

Philipus, M.H, (1994). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Prasetiyo, A. (2017). Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Menjalankan Prinsip Tata Kelola Kantor Notaris, Jurnal Akta, (4) 3, 441–48.

Ridwan, HR. (2003). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Sagala, E, (2016) Tanggungjawab Notaris Dalam Menjalankan Tugas Profesinya.’, Jurnal Ilmiah ‘Advokasi’, 04, 25–33.

Supriyanta. (2013)., Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, (2), 3, 137–44 <https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i3.10174>.

Tirtaamidjaya, M.H. (19955). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Fasco.

Yulianti, E.D dan Anshori, T. (2021) Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Bagi Notari Salam Membuat Akta Otentik Berdasarkan Perspektif Pasal 65 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris’, Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, (6) 1, 45-54.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-16

Issue

Section

Articles