The effect of motivation and learning discipline on student learning outcomes in online-based Buddhist religious education subjects

Authors

  • Mujiyanto Mujiyanto STIAB Smaratungga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v21i1.3402

Keywords:

Learning, Motivation Learning, Discipline Learning, Outcomes e-Learning

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of learning motivation and learning discipline on student learning outcomes in the subject of Buddhist education using E-Learning learning. This study uses a quantitative approach with the ex post facto method, the nature of the ex post facto is that there is no control over the variables. The sample of this study consisted of junior high school Buddhist religious education students in Semarang district. The data in this study were obtained through non-test techniques in the form of questionnaires and also documentation techniques in the form of student learning outcomes in Buddhist subjects. The data in this study were analyzed using inferential statistical analysis techniques, namely multiple regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant influence between students' motivation and learning discipline simultaneously on student learning outcomes in e-learning-based Buddhist subjects (0.00 <0.05); and the magnitude of the joint contribution between motivation and student learning discipline on student learning outcomes in e-learning-based Buddhist subjects is 75%.

References

Addae, D. (2020). Learning behind bars: Motivations and challenges of learners in a correctional facility in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101650

Beymer, P. N., & Robinson, K. A. (2022). Motivating by measuring motivation? Examining reactivity in a diary study on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 70, 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102072

Caputo, A. (2015). The motivational patterns of school learning: A correlational study on self-concept and attributions. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 2015(12), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2015-012-capu

Daumiller, M., Janke, S., Hein, J., Rinas, R., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2021). Do teachers’ achievement goals and self-efficacy beliefs matter for students’ learning experiences? Evidence from two studies on perceived teaching quality and emotional experiences. Teacher Motivation: Implications for Instruction and Learning, 76, 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101458

Franco, E., Coterón, J., Gómez, V., & Spray, C. M. (2021). A person-centred approach to understanding dark-side antecedents and students’ outcomes associated with physical education teachers’ motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 57, 102021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102021

Janssens, O., Haerens, L., Valcke, M., Beeckman, D., Pype, P., & Embo, M. (2022). The role of ePortfolios in supporting learning in eight healthcare disciplines: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 63, 103418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103418

Javadizadeh, B., Aplin-Houtz, M., & Casile, M. (2022). Using SCARF as a motivational tool to enhance students′ class performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(1), 100594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100594

Kartianom, K, & Retnawati, H. (2018). Why Are Their Mathematical Learning Achievements Different? Re-Analysis Timss 2015 Data in Indonesia, Japan And Turkey. International Journal on New Trends in Education & Their Implications (IJONTE), 9(2).

Kartianom, Kartianom, & Ndayizeye, O. (2017). What‘s wrong with the Asian and African Students’ mathematics learning achievement? The multilevel PISA 2015 data analysis for Indonesia, Japan, and Algeria. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 200–210.

Kowitlawakul, Y., Tan, J. J. M., Suebnukarn, S., Nguyen, H. D., Poo, D. C. C., Chai, J., … Devi, K. (2022). Utilizing educational technology in enhancing undergraduate nursing students’ engagement and motivation: A scoping review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 42, 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.015

Kryshko, O., Fleischer, J., Waldeyer, J., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2020). Do motivational regulation strategies contribute to university students’ academic success? Learning and Individual Differences, 82, 101912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101912

Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021

Little, T. D. (2013). The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology: Vol. 2: statistical analysis (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.

Liu, Y., Hau, K.-T., & Zheng, X. (2018). Does instrumental motivation help students with low intrinsic motivation? Comparison between Western and Confucian students. International Journal of Psychology : Journal International de Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12563

Singh, M., James, P. S., Paul, H., & Bolar, K. (2022). Impact of cognitive-behavioral motivation on student engagement. Heliyon, 8(7), e09843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09843

Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314

Teig, N., & Nilsen, T. (2022). Profiles of instructional quality in primary and secondary education: Patterns, predictors, and relations to student achievement and motivation in science. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, 101170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101170

Valle, N., Antonenko, P., Valle, D., Dawson, K., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Baiser, B. (2021). The influence of task-value scaffolding in a predictive learning analytics dashboard on learners’ statistics anxiety, motivation, and performance. Computers & Education, 173, 104288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104288

Vettori, G., Vezzani, C., Bigozzi, L., & Pinto, G. (2020). Cluster profiles of university students’ conceptions of learning according to gender, educational level, and academic disciplines. Learning and Motivation, 70, 101628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101628

Wilson, A., Madjar, I., & McNaughton, S. (2016). Opportunity to learn about disciplinary literacy in senior secondary English classrooms in New Zealand. The Curriculum Journal. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585176.2015.1134339

Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, C., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095731

Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., & Liu, L. (2022). Exploring non-traditional learner motivations and characteristics in online learning: A learner profile study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100051

Downloads

Published

2022-12-12

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.