Optional problem solving in peer-to-peer lending
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v21i2.3320Keywords:
Optional, Problem Solving, Peer to Peer LendingAbstract
This study aims to find alternative solutions to peer-to-peer lending problems. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The data collection technique used is documentation technique (scientific journal articles related to peer-to-peer lending). The data analysis technique used is analytical descriptive analysis regarding default settlement options in peer-to-peer lending. The results of this study indicate that alternative solutions for solving peer-to-peer lending problems are based on  Article 21 POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 the parties are required to mitigate risks through litigation channels, namely by going to court on the basis of default (Article 1243 Civil Code) made by the recipient of the loan; and the non-litigation route, namely through mediation because mediation efforts are included in the substance of the law (Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution).
References
Butarbutar, R. (2020). Personal data protection in P2P lending: What Indonesia should learn from Malaysia? Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(3), 2295–2307. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85092666971&partnerID=40&md5=8b00ea6dde51c5eac2a1e0d2715a1327
Cochrane, J. H. (2014). Challenges for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Financial Regulation. The Journal of Legal Studies, 43(S2), S63–S105. https://doi.org/10.1086/678351
Feng, F., Wang, X., & Chen, T. (2021). Analysis of the attributes of rights to inferred information and China’s choice of legal regulation. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105565. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105565
Ferretti, F. (2021). Peer-to-Peer lending and EU credit laws: A creditworthiness assessment, credit-risk analysis or... neither of the two? German Law Journal, 22(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.100
Katz, V. (2015). Regulating the Sharing Economy. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30(4), 1067–1126. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26377749
Kharisma, D. B. (2021). Urgency of financial technology (Fintech) laws in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(3), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2020-0233
Ko, P.-C., Lin, P.-C., Do, H.-T., & Huang, Y.-F. (2022). P2P Lending Default Prediction Based on AI and Statistical Models. Entropy, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/e24060801
Lee, S. (2021). Determining personal credit rating through voice analysis: Case of P2P loan borrowers. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 15(10), 3627–3641. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2021.10.009
Liu, X., Huang, F., & Yeung, H. (2018). The regulation of illegal fundraising in China. Asia Pacific Law Review, 26(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2018.1511086
Luther, J. (2020). Twenty-first century financial regulation: P2P lending, fintech, and the argument for a special purpose fintech charter approach. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 168(4), 1013–1059. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090913717&partnerID=40&md5=2574463a2d3c24a8bde01f817f159b3b
Peng, X., Luo, X., & Li, J. (2019). Meaning construction and judicial identification: Difficulties and countermeasures of criminal regulation of illegal fundraising behavior on online P2P lending platforms. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 4(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2019-2018
Putri, C. R. (2018). Tanggung gugat penyelenggara peer to peer lending jika penerima pinjaman melakukan wanprestasi. Jurist-Diction, 1(2), 460–475.
Sha, Y. (2022). Rating manipulation and creditworthiness for platform economy: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102393
Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2021). Detection of fintech P2P lending issues in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(4), e06782. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06782
Suryono, R. R., Purwandari, B., & Budi, I. (2019). Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending Problems and Potential Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 204–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.116
Walker, G. (2017). INTERNATIONAL LAW: FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY LAW: A NEW BEGINNING AND A NEW FUTURE. GPSolo, 34(3), 76–77. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26425830
Yu, T., & Shen, W. (2019). Funds sharing regulation in the context of the sharing economy: Understanding the logic of China’s P2P lending regulation. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.10.001
Zhang, L., Zhao, R., Wang, B., Wang, H., & Zhao, T. (2022). Bankruptcy Exemption and Peer-to-Peer Lending. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(3), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1926979
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
