The principle of accountability for the object of the auction held

Authors

  • Abdul Majid Universitas Narotama Surabaya
  • Habib Adjie Universitas Narotama Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v21i2.3319

Keywords:

Accountability Principles, Auction Objects, Auction Held

Abstract

This study aims to determine the principles of accountability owned by PT Balai Lelang Serasi. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The data collection technique used is documentation technique (literature study and scientific journal articles). The data analysis technique used is descriptive and critical analysis. The results of this study indicate that the principle of accountability owned by PT Balai Lelang Serasi can be seen from the provision of access to prospective bidders to check the physical condition and completeness of the auction object documents at the open house stage; obliges the prospective bidder to pay a security deposit which will later be returned to the bidder in accordance with what is stated on the registration form (auction participants must deposit a security deposit of Rp 5,000,000 (five million rupiah)/car and auction list as proof of commitment that the prospective bidder guarantees that he or she is willing to participate in the auction); and the auction winner is fully responsible for what he bids, and he wins.

References

Boone, A. L., & Harold Mulherin, J. (2008). Do auctions induce a winner’s curse? New evidence from the corporate takeover market. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.08.003

Brandão, L. G. L., & Ehrl, P. (2022). The impact of transmission auctions on Brazilian electric power companies. Utilities Policy, 78, 101412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2022.101412

Brown, D. P., Eckert, A., & Olmstead, D. E. H. (2022). Procurement auctions for regulated retail service contracts in restructured electricity markets. Energy Economics, 116, 106387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106387

Carratù, M., Chiarini, B., & Piselli, P. (2020). Effects of European emission unit allowance auctions on corporate profitability. Energy Policy, 144, 111584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111584

Dasgupta, S., & Hansen, R. G. (2007). Chapter 3 - Auctions in Corporate Finance**We thank Parimal K. Bag, Espen Eckbo and Mike Fishman for comments and suggestions. In B. E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance (pp. 87–143). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53265-7.50017-2

Dastidar, K. G., & Mukherjee, D. (2014). Corruption in delegated public procurement auctions. European Journal of Political Economy, 35, 122–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.05.003

Dimitriou, T., & Krontiris, I. (2017). Privacy-respecting auctions and rewarding mechanisms in mobile crowd-sensing applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 100, 24–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.10.012

Huang, Y. (2019). An empirical study of scoring auctions and quality manipulation corruption. European Economic Review, 120, 103322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103322

Imhof, D., & Wallimann, H. (2021). Detecting bid-rigging coalitions in different countries and auction formats. International Review of Law and Economics, 68, 106016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.106016

Jansen, M., Beiter, P., Riepin, I., Müsgens, F., Guajardo-Fajardo, V. J., Staffell, I., Bulder, B., & Kitzing, L. (2022). Policy choices and outcomes for offshore wind auctions globally. Energy Policy, 167, 113000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113000

Messer, K. D., Duke, J. M., Lynch, L., & Li, T. (2017). When Does Public Information Undermine the Efficiency of Reverse Auctions for the Purchase of Ecosystem Services? Ecological Economics, 134, 212–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.004

Münch, F. A., & Marian, A. (2022). The design of technical requirements in public solar auctions: Evidence from India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, 111713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111713

Ozcan, M. (2021). Renewable energy auctions in Turkey: Auction design based on stakeholder opinions. Renewable Energy, 169, 473–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.009

Sareen, S., & Wolf, S. A. (2021). Accountability and sustainability transitions. Ecological Economics, 185, 107056. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107056

Setiyono, B. (2007). Pemerintahan dan Manajemen Sektor Publik. Kalam Nusantara.

Silaghi, F., & Sarkar, S. (2021). Agency problems in public-private partnerships investment projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 290(3), 1174–1191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.050

Tan, E., Mahula, S., & Crompvoets, J. (2022). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625

Uyar, A., Fernandes, V., & Kuzey, C. (2021). The mediating role of corporate governance between public governance and logistics performance: International evidence. Transport Policy, 109, 37–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.023

Zhao, Z., Wu, G., Susilo, W., Guo, F., Wang, B., & Hu, Y. (2019). Accountable identity-based encryption with distributed private key generators. Information Sciences, 505, 352–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.086

Downloads

Published

2022-12-16

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.