Regulatory sandboxes solusi melewati lembah kematian inovasi guna mendorong hilirisasi riset perguruan tinggi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v20i2.1414Keywords:
innovation, knowledge-based economy, valley of death innovation, impact assessment regulatory, quadruple helixAbstract
Innovation system is one of the important pillars of knowledge-based economy. The weakness of research conducted by universities, research and development and industry institutions in the country so far is that the results of his research did not reach the commercialization stage because it could not pass through the valley of death innovation. Research should still be encouraged to downstream process by adjusting regulations to be more friendly to researchers. Innovation requires a conducive ecosystem, in the form of wide wiggle room and without any constraints including legal. Regulatory sandboxes become important to test and produce the value / output of an aspect of the study based on real conditions in the community, quickly and appropriately compared to the assistance of regulation at the national level that takes a long time and large resources. This research uses normative juridical methods, with legal approach methods, conceptual approach, and comparison approach, equipped with secondary data that includes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, obtained through the study of documents or library materials, which later seek to describe the formulation of the problem, namely, Regulator Sandboxes is an Impact Assessment Regulator in the field of technology to encourage downstream process research results. Regulator Sandboxes synergy between helix in Quadruple Helix in tackling valley death innovation
Sistem inovasi merupakan salah satu pilar penting dari ekonomi berbasis pengetahuan (knowledge-based economy). Kelemahan peneltian yang dilakukan oleh Perguruan Tinggi, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Industri dalam negeri selama ini ialah hasil penelitiannya tidak sampai pada tahap komersialisasi disebabkan tidak bisa melewati lembah kematian inovasi (valley of death). Penelitian harus tetap didorong untuk di hilirisasi dengan cara menyesuaikan regulasi agar lebih ramah terhadap peneliti. Inovasi membutuhkan ekosistem yang kondusif, berupa ruang gerak yang luas dan tanpa ada kendala apapun termasuk legal (hukum). Regulatory sandboxes menjadi penting untuk menguji dan menghasilkan nilai/output dari suatu aspek kajian berdasarkan kondisi riil di masyarakat (lapangan) dengan cepat dan tepat dibandingkan pembentukan regulasi di tingkat nasional yang membutuhkan waktu lama dan sumber daya besar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif (legal research), dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perbandingan, dilengkapi data-data sekunder yang mencakup bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tertier, yang diperoleh melalui studi dokumen atau bahan pustaka, yang nantinya berusaha menggambarkan tentang rumusan masalah yakni; Regulator Sanboxes merupakan Regulator Impact Assessment dalam bidang teknologi untuk mendorong hilirisasi hasil riset. Regulator Sanboxes mendorong sinergitas antar helix di Qudruple Helix dalam mengatasi lembah kematian inovasi.
References
Amiruddin dan Asikin, Z. (2012), Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafinfo Persada
Armstrong, H., Gorst, C. and Rae, J. (2019). Renewing regulation, ‘Anticipatory regulation’ in a age of disruption, UK: Nesta
Anatan, L. (2008), “Kolaborasi Universitas-Industri: Tinjauan Konseptual Mekanisme Transfer Pengetahuan Dari Universitas Ke Industri,†Jurnal Manajemen, 8 (1), 26-37
Anggota Dewan Riset Nasional 2019-2022, Peran Strategis Inovasi Dalam Meningkatkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Jakarta: Dewan Riset Nasional
Anggota Dewan Riset Nasional 2015-2018, Bunga Rampai Inovasi Pergulatan Pemikiran Berbagai Perspektif, Jakarta: Dewan Riset Nasional
Asmara, C. G. (2020). Daya Saing R.I Melorot 8 Peringkat, R. I Kalah Cepat?. CNBC Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200619092949-4-166485/daya-saing-ri-melorot-8-peringkat-ri-kalah-cepat
BAL, H. C., and ERKAN, C. (2019). “Industry 4.0 and Competitiveness,†Procedia Computer Science, 158, 625-631
Benuf, K. and Azhar, M. (2020), “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer,†Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 7 (1), 20-33
Datta, A., Mukherjee, D. and Jessup, L. (2014). “Understanding commercialization of technological innovation: taking stock and moving forward,†RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1-35
Etzkowitz, H. (2003), “Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relation,†Social Science Information, 42 (3), 293-337
Fauzy, A. (2019). “Hilirisasi Hasil Penelitian Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Bangsa,†Research Fair Unisri 2019, 3 (1), 413-418
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). (2019). Making space for innovation-The handbook for regulatory sandboxes, Germany: Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi).
Financial Conduct Authority, (2015). Regulatory Sandbox, United Kingdom: Financial Conduct Authority
Guan, C., Jiang, Z. and Ding, D. (2020). “The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0),†In The Emerging Business Models, Singapore University of Social Sciences: World Sientific Future Economic Series, 02, 1-5
Gromova, E. (2020), “Regulatory Sanboxes (Experimental Legal Regimes) for Digital Innovation in BRIC,†BRIC Law Journal, VII (2), 10-36
Hasima, R. (2020), “Penerapan Metode Regulatory Impact Assessment Dalam Penyusunan Peraturan Daerah di Kota Kendari,†Halu Oleo Law Review, 04 (1) 54-71
Herman, M., Pentek, T. and Otto, B. (2015), Design Principle for Industrie 4.0 scenarioa: A Literatur review, Working Paper, 01, 1-16
Huggins, R., and Johnston, A. (2009), “The economic and innovation contribution of universities: a regional perspective,†Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1088-1106
Hunter, L. and Mahoney, S. (2020), Regulatory Sandboxes and Innovation Testbeds (Final Report), New York: Inter-American Development Bank
Idayanti, S., Hartati, S. and Haryadi, T. (2019), “Pembangunan Hukum Bisnis Dalam Perspektof Pancasila Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,†Jurnal Jurisprudence, 9 (1), 90-101
IMD World Competitiveness Center, IMD World Digital Competitiveness Rangking (WDCR) 2020, Switzerland: IMD Switzerland
Kirkpatrick, C., and Parker, D. (2004). “Regulatory Impact Assessment and Regulatory Governance in Developing Countries,†Public Administration and Development, 24, 333-344
Lim, T. W. (2019). Industrial Revolution 4.0, Tech Giants, and Digitized Societies, Singapore: The Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7470-8
Linberg, M., Lindgren, M. and Packendorff, P. (2014), â€Quadruple Helix as a Way to Bridge the Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship: The Case of an Innovation System Project in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5, 94-113
Marzuki, P.M. (2009), Peneltian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana
Mukhlish, B. M. (2018), “Kolaborasi Antara Universitas, Industri, Dan Pemerintah Dalam Meningkatkan Inovasi Dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat: Konsep, Implementasi Dan Tantangan,†Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Terapan, 1 (1), 31-43
Noveri, M. R. (in press), “Penerapan Regulatory Sandboxes Untuk Hilirisasi Hasil Riset Perguruan Tinggi Guna Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0,†Prosiding Seminar Nasional-Call For Paper Artificial Intelligence dalam Bidang Hukum di Era Teknologi Informasi,…
Patnaik, S. (Eds.). (2020). New Paradigm of Industry 4.0-Internet of Things, Big Data & Cyber Physical System, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Switzerland: World Economic Forum
Sjachrial, E. (2017), “Perpustakaan Digital Dalam Mendukung Inovasi,†Dipresentasikan dalam Konferensi Perpusatkaan Digital Indonesia ke-10, Mataram. Dirjen Penguatan Inovasi
Sesjen Kemenristekdikti, (2018), Kreatif dan Inovatif di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0, Ristekdikti, 8 (1), 1-56
Soebagyo, H. (2018, Desember), “Peningkatan Peran Riset Iptek dan Pendidikan Tinggi Untuk Merespon Revolusi Industri 4.0,†Paper dipresentasikan di Seminar Nasional Instrumentasi, Kontrol dan Otomasi (SNIKO), Bandung
Susanto, F. S. (2007), Penelitian Hukum, Yogyakarta: CV. Ganda
Suska, (2012), “Prinsip Regulatory Impact Assessment dalam Proses Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Sesuai UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011,†Jurnal Konstitusi, 9 (2), 358
Wechsler, M., Perlman, L. and Gurung, M. (2018), The State of Regulatory Sandbox Developing Country, New York: Digital Financial Service Observatory
World Bank Group, (2017). Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance: Worlwide Practice of Regulatory Impact Assessments,
Xu, M., David, J. M. and Kim, S. H. (2018). “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Challenges,†Internationl Journal of Financial Research. 9 (2), 90-95
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
