Penerapan Hukum Adat Aluk Todolo dalam Penyelesaian Delik Adat pada Masyarakat Toraja

Authors

  • Yoland Suryamodjo Pratama Universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v25i1.10610

Keywords:

Customary Law, Aluk Todolo, Customary Offences, Pluralisme Hukum, Toraja Community

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the Aluk Todolo customary law in resolving customary violations within the Toraja community and to understand the role of customary institutions in maintaining social order alongside the national legal system. This research employs a qualitative approach with an empirical legal research design. Data were collected through observation, interviews with customary leaders and community members, and documentation of customary dispute resolution practices in the Toraja area. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis to explain the mechanisms of dispute resolution based on the values, norms, and sanctions embedded in the Aluk Todolo customary law. The results show that Aluk Todolo customary law still plays a significant role in resolving customary violations within the community. The settlement process is conducted through customary deliberations involving traditional leaders, the families of the disputing parties, and local community members. The sanctions imposed are not merely punitive but also aim to restore social harmony and balance within the community. The existence of this customary legal system indicates that local legal traditions remain relevant and can coexist with state law in maintaining social order and preserving the cultural values of the Toraja people.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan hukum adat Aluk Todolo dalam penyelesaian pelanggaran adat pada masyarakat Toraja serta memahami peran lembaga adat dalam menjaga keteraturan sosial di tengah sistem hukum nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian hukum empiris. Data diperoleh melalui observasi, wawancara dengan tokoh adat dan masyarakat setempat, serta studi dokumentasi terhadap praktik penyelesaian perkara adat di wilayah Toraja. Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif untuk menggambarkan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa berdasarkan nilai, norma, dan sanksi dalam hukum adat Aluk Todolo. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum adat Aluk Todolo masih memiliki peran penting dalam menyelesaikan pelanggaran adat yang terjadi di masyarakat. Proses penyelesaian perkara dilakukan melalui musyawarah adat yang melibatkan pemangku adat, keluarga pihak yang berselisih, serta masyarakat setempat. Sanksi yang diberikan tidak hanya bersifat hukuman, tetapi juga mengandung nilai pemulihan hubungan sosial dan keseimbangan komunitas. Keberadaan hukum adat ini menunjukkan bahwa sistem hukum lokal tetap relevan dan berjalan berdampingan dengan hukum negara dalam menjaga ketertiban serta kelestarian nilai budaya masyarakat Toraja.

References

Aprilianti, & Kasmawati. (2022). Hukum Adat di Indonesia. Pusaka Media. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/47458/1/Hukum Adat.pdf

ApriYanti, R. A. (2023). Pluralisme hukum di indonesia. Jurnal Cerdas Hukum, 6(1), 52–58.

Bedner, A., & Arizona, Y. (2019). Adat in Indonesian Land Law : A Promise for the Future or a Dead End? The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670246

Benda-beckmannn, F. Von, & Benda-beckmannn, K. Von. (2013). The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders. The Jpurnal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 38(53), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2006.10756597

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Tu3m_jTV5P4C&hl=id&source=gbs_citations_module_r&cad=5

Chinyere, N., & Val, E. (2023). Qualitative Research. International Digital Organization for Scientific Research, 8(1), 20–35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367221023_Qualitative_Research

Dirkareshza, R., Novyana, H., & Nurhalizah, A. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa pada Masyarakat Hukum Adat Urug melalui Studi Etnografi. Jurnal Ilmiha Ilmu Sosial, 10(2), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v10i2.83772

Flambonita, S., Novianti, V., Febriansyah, A., Flambonita, S., Novianti, V., & Febriansyah, A. (2021). The Concept of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia in the New Social Movement. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 10(Special), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v10i0.45939

Hariri, A., & Babussalam, B. (2024). Legal Pluralism Concept. Theoritical Dialectics, and Its Existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review, 6(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566

Hasugian, Y. E. (2026). Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian. Law Jurnal, VI(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v6i2.8184

Huyler, D. (2019). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, by John Creswell and J. David Creswell. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 31(3), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20258 Authors:

Ismail, R. S., Roziqin, Thaba, A., & Prasetya, K. H. (2024). Hukum Adat: Teori dan Perkembangannya. PT. Mafy Media Literasi Indonesia. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/610795-hukum-adat-teori-dan-perkembangannya-4e2ad103.pdf

Khalil, M., Ali, I., Maulina, M., Nurahman, A. M., Khalil, M., Ali, I., Maulina, M., Nurrahman, A. M., Ahmad, T. A., & Angrayni, L. (2024). Efektivitas dan Tantangan Pelaksanaan Restoratif Justice dalam Komponen Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(7), 1–21. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/456

Linchia, D., Heningdyah, L., & Kusumawardhani, N. (2025). Restorative Justice Sebagai Manifestasi Tujuan Hukum : Kajian Filsafat Ilmu Hukum Dalam Wilayah Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Tengah. Recidive Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 14(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.209614recidive.v1412.100482

Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. In Zeitschrift fur Personalforschung (Vol. 28).

Moore, S. F. (1978). Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Panjaitan, Y. B., & Rahayu, D. A. (2024). Hukum Adat Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dalam Pendekatan Restorative. Merdeka Law Journal, 5(November), 187–195. https://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/mlj/article/view/15349

Partini, N. N. T. (2024). Peran Hukum Adat dalam Penegakan Hukum dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jurnal Virtue Jurisprudence, 2(2), 192–201. https://jurnal.usp.ac.id/index.php/virtue-jurispudence/en/article/view/180

Rahmita, D., Hardiansyah, I., & Rambe, W. S. (2025). Analisis Komparatif Sistem Hukum Adat dan Hukum Positif dalam Harmonisasi Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia. Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2il.456

Santos, B. de S. (2002). Toward a New Legal Common Sense (2nd ed.). Butterworths. https://doi.org/10.1525/POL.2005.28.2.323

Setyowati, R. K. (2023). Pengakuan Negara Terhadap Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Binamulia Hukum, 12(4), 2279–2283. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.601

Swift, A. (2022). Being Creative with Resources in Qualitative. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Design (pp. 290–306). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278.n19

Syarifuddin, L. (2019). Sistem Hukum Adat Terhadap Upaya Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Risalah Hukum, 15(2), 1–10. https://e-journal.fh.unmul.ac.id/index.php/risalah/article/view/84

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

Issue

Section

Articles